RECS vs. CRED
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF (CRED).
RECS and CRED are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RECS is a passively managed fund by Ameriprise Financial that tracks the performance of the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2019. CRED is a passively managed fund by Columbia that tracks the performance of the Beta Advantage Lionstone Research Enhanced REIT Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Apr 26, 2023. Both RECS and CRED are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RECS vs. CRED - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RECS vs. CRED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RECS Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF | -4.55% | 19.30% | 26.27% | 17.16% |
CRED Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF | 3.12% | -2.30% | 5.21% | 13.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RECS achieves a -4.55% return, which is significantly lower than CRED's 3.12% return.
RECS
- 1D
- 2.71%
- 1M
- -4.67%
- YTD
- -4.55%
- 6M
- -2.31%
- 1Y
- 18.70%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 12.91%
- 10Y*
- 8.68%
CRED
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- -6.02%
- YTD
- 3.12%
- 6M
- -0.85%
- 1Y
- 0.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RECS vs. CRED - Expense Ratio Comparison
RECS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CRED's 0.33% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RECS vs. CRED — Risk / Return Rank
RECS
CRED
RECS vs. CRED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF (CRED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RECS | CRED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 0.00 | +1.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 0.11 | +1.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.01 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 0.10 | +1.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.20 | 0.29 | +6.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RECS | CRED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 0.00 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.39 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between RECS and CRED is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RECS vs. CRED - Dividend Comparison
RECS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than CRED's 4.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RECS Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF | 1.16% | 1.11% | 1.09% | 1.00% | 1.41% | 20.64% | 1.09% | 0.49% |
CRED Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF | 4.94% | 5.50% | 4.82% | 2.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RECS vs. CRED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RECS drawdown since its inception was -34.29%, which is greater than CRED's maximum drawdown of -17.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RECS and CRED.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RECS | CRED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.29% | -17.59% | -16.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.45% | -11.36% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.34% | -7.62% | +1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.29% | -5.88% | +4.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 3.92% | -1.22% |
Volatility
RECS vs. CRED - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF (CRED) at 4.29%. This indicates that RECS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RECS | CRED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.03% | 4.29% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.27% | 9.06% | +0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.20% | 15.46% | +2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 16.38% | +0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 16.38% | -0.24% |