RECS vs. PRF
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF).
RECS and PRF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RECS is a passively managed fund by Ameriprise Financial that tracks the performance of the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2019. PRF is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the FTSE RAFI US 1000 Index. It was launched on Dec 19, 2005. Both RECS and PRF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RECS or PRF.
Correlation
The correlation between RECS and PRF is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RECS vs. PRF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RECS:
1.97
PRF:
1.73
RECS:
2.64
PRF:
2.43
RECS:
1.37
PRF:
1.32
RECS:
3.01
PRF:
2.97
RECS:
12.28
PRF:
8.44
RECS:
1.96%
PRF:
2.27%
RECS:
12.22%
PRF:
11.08%
RECS:
-34.29%
PRF:
-60.35%
RECS:
0.00%
PRF:
-0.19%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RECS achieves a 4.33% return, which is significantly lower than PRF's 5.63% return.
RECS
4.33%
2.15%
10.02%
25.36%
15.69%
N/A
PRF
5.63%
2.48%
8.90%
19.92%
13.03%
10.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RECS vs. PRF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RECS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PRF's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RECS vs. PRF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
RECS
PRF
RECS vs. PRF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RECS vs. PRF - Dividend Comparison
RECS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than PRF's 1.69% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RECS Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF | 1.05% | 1.09% | 1.00% | 1.41% | 20.65% | 1.09% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRF Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF | 1.69% | 1.78% | 1.84% | 2.01% | 1.58% | 1.97% | 1.99% | 2.25% | 1.58% | 2.17% | 2.25% | 1.73% |
Drawdowns
RECS vs. PRF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RECS drawdown since its inception was -34.29%, smaller than the maximum PRF drawdown of -60.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RECS and PRF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RECS vs. PRF - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) has a higher volatility of 3.02% compared to Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) at 2.36%. This indicates that RECS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.