RECS vs. IUS

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RECS (Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF) and IUS (Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RECS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index, while IUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Invesco Strategic US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RECS returned 13.80%/yr vs 13.86%/yr for IUS. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RECS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IUS.

Performance

RECS vs. IUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RECS achieves a 5.58% return, which is significantly lower than IUS's 14.45% return.

RECS

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -0.32%
• YTD: 5.58%
• 6M: 5.12%
• 1Y: 23.04%
• 3Y*: 20.79%
• 5Y*: 13.80%
• 10Y*: 9.79%

IUS

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 14.45%
• 6M: 14.22%
• 1Y: 31.41%
• 3Y*: 19.92%
• 5Y*: 13.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RECS vs. IUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RECS Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF	5.58%	19.30%	26.27%	23.19%	-14.39%	32.73%	15.35%	-0.93%	0.00%
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF	14.45%	16.94%	16.51%	20.79%	-8.34%	32.17%	15.09%	29.34%	-12.28%

Correlation

The correlation between RECS and IUS is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018	0.83

The correlation between RECS and IUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

RECS vs. IUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RECS	IUS
Technology	32.9%	26.7%
Financial Services	16.9%	6.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.4%	10.4%
Healthcare	9.2%	12.6%
Communication Services	7.6%	13.0%
Industrials	7.3%	9.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	6.9%
Energy	3.5%	9.4%
Utilities	2.3%	1.0%
Real Estate	2.3%	0.4%
Basic Materials	2.2%	3.2%

Return for Risk

RECS vs. IUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RECS

RECS Risk / Return Rank: 58
RECS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
RECS Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
RECS Omega Ratio Rank: 56
RECS Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
RECS Martin Ratio Rank: 63

IUS

IUS Risk / Return Rank: 90
IUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
IUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
IUS Omega Ratio Rank: 89
IUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IUS Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RECS vs. IUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RECS	IUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	2.95	-1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	4.02	-1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.53	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	5.13	-2.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.11	21.42	-10.31

RECS vs. IUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RECS Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is lower than the IUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RECS and IUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RECS vs. IUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RECS drawdown since its inception was -34.29%, roughly equal to the maximum IUS drawdown of -34.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RECS and IUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	RECS	IUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.29%	-34.67%	+0.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.82%	-6.15%	-2.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.60%	-15.61%	-2.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.08%	-18.72%	-3.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.89%	-1.74%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.28%	-3.85%	+2.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	1.47%	+0.61%

Volatility

RECS vs. IUS - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) have volatilities of 3.86% and 3.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RECS	IUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.86%	3.84%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.37%	8.03%	+1.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.12%	10.71%	+1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.43%	15.03%	+1.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.26%	18.03%	-1.77%

RECS vs. IUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RECS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IUS's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

RECS vs. IUS - Dividend Comparison

RECS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than IUS's 1.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF	1.62%	1.48%	1.52%	1.72%	1.78%	1.46%	1.74%	1.77%	0.73%
RECS Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF	1.05%	1.11%	1.09%	1.00%	1.41%	20.64%	1.09%	0.49%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RECS and IUS in my portfolio?

RECS and IUS have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RECS or IUS?

RECS has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to IUS (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RECS dropped -34.29% vs IUS's -34.67%.

Which ETF is better, RECS or IUS?

On 5-year performance, IUS leads with 13.86% vs 13.80% for RECS. On fees, RECS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RECS or IUS?

Over the 5-year period, IUS has performed better with a 13.86% return vs 13.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RECS or IUS?

RECS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RECS or IUS?

IUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 1.05% for RECS.

What is the main difference between RECS and IUS?

RECS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. RECS tracks Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index, while IUS tracks Invesco Strategic US Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for RECS and 0.19% for IUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.