PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDIV vs. FVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDIV vs. FVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 11.95% return, which is significantly higher than FVD's 2.21% return. Over the past 10 years, RDIV has outperformed FVD with an annualized return of 10.95%, while FVD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.30% annualized return.


RDIV

1D
-1.30%
1M
2.29%
YTD
11.95%
6M
11.03%
1Y
27.04%
3Y*
19.26%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
10.95%

FVD

1D
-0.59%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
2.21%
6M
2.80%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
8.25%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*
8.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDIV vs. FVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
11.95%12.36%15.17%4.66%7.16%29.12%-9.31%22.62%-4.78%11.63%
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.21%8.16%10.04%4.11%-5.18%25.08%-0.02%26.58%-3.49%12.51%

Correlation

The correlation between RDIV and FVD is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2013

0.81

The correlation between RDIV and FVD shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RDIV vs. FVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RDIV
FVD

Energy

28.8%
4.0%

Financial Services

18.0%
19.1%

Consumer Defensive

15.9%
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
5.6%

Real Estate

8.0%
8.1%

Healthcare

7.8%
7.8%

Utilities

6.4%
18.4%

Technology

5.1%
6.1%

Basic Materials

0.5%
2.1%

Communication Services

-

3.0%

Industrials

-

14.2%

Energy

RDIV
28.8%
FVD
4.0%

Financial Services

RDIV
18.0%
FVD
19.1%

Consumer Defensive

RDIV
15.9%
FVD
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

RDIV
9.5%
FVD
5.6%

Real Estate

RDIV
8.0%
FVD
8.1%

Healthcare

RDIV
7.8%
FVD
7.8%

Utilities

RDIV
6.4%
FVD
18.4%

Technology

RDIV
5.1%
FVD
6.1%

Basic Materials

RDIV
0.5%
FVD
2.1%

Communication Services

RDIV

-

FVD
3.0%

Industrials

RDIV

-

FVD
14.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDIV vs. FVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDIV
RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FVD
FVD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDIV vs. FVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RDIVFVDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.06

0.72

+1.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.07

1.12

+1.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.13

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.61

0.95

+4.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.50

2.58

+13.92

RDIV vs. FVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the FVD Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDIV and FVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDIVFVDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

0.72

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.41

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.54

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.58

-0.03

Drawdowns

RDIV vs. FVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, roughly equal to the maximum FVD drawdown of -51.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and FVD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDIVFVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.97%

-51.00%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.84%

-7.23%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.91%

-11.97%

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.89%

-16.41%

-8.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.97%

-35.25%

-14.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-5.96%

+4.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.86%

-5.44%

-0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

2.66%

-1.01%

Volatility

RDIV vs. FVD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) at 2.62%. This indicates that RDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDIVFVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

2.62%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.62%

6.73%

+1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.23%

9.50%

+3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.53%

12.76%

+4.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.89%

15.44%

+6.45%

RDIV vs. FVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FVD's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDIV vs. FVD - Dividend Comparison

RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, more than FVD's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.31%2.36%2.23%2.34%2.20%1.75%2.31%2.03%2.50%2.10%2.04%2.34%
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
3.66%3.94%4.08%3.93%3.44%3.31%4.93%3.84%4.32%4.26%2.20%4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDIV and FVD have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDIV has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to FVD (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs FVD's -51.00%.

On 10-year performance, RDIV leads with 10.95% vs 8.30% for FVD. On fees, RDIV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FVD has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 10.95% return vs 8.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDIV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.

RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 2.31% for FVD.

RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.61% for FVD.

RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDIV and FVD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer