PortfoliosLab logo
QVML vs. MFDX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QVML and MFDX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

QVML vs. MFDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QVML:

0.66

MFDX:

1.01

Sortino Ratio

QVML:

1.06

MFDX:

1.52

Omega Ratio

QVML:

1.16

MFDX:

1.21

Calmar Ratio

QVML:

0.70

MFDX:

1.38

Martin Ratio

QVML:

2.77

MFDX:

3.77

Ulcer Index

QVML:

4.74%

MFDX:

4.27%

Daily Std Dev

QVML:

19.83%

MFDX:

15.53%

Max Drawdown

QVML:

-23.53%

MFDX:

-35.50%

Current Drawdown

QVML:

-3.07%

MFDX:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVML achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly lower than MFDX's 18.64% return.


QVML

YTD

2.13%

1M

12.12%

6M

1.54%

1Y

13.02%

3Y*

16.18%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

MFDX

YTD

18.64%

1M

8.39%

6M

16.50%

1Y

15.53%

3Y*

12.59%

5Y*

13.60%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QVML vs. MFDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVML has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than MFDX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

QVML vs. MFDX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVML
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QVML is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QVML is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QVML is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QVML is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QVML is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QVML is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

MFDX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MFDX is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MFDX is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MFDX is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MFDX is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MFDX is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MFDX is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QVML vs. MFDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current QVML Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the MFDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVML and MFDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

QVML vs. MFDX - Dividend Comparison

QVML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than MFDX's 2.94% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
QVML
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
1.18%1.15%1.43%1.72%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MFDX
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF
2.94%3.16%3.12%2.85%2.99%1.58%2.88%2.98%0.71%

Drawdowns

QVML vs. MFDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVML drawdown since its inception was -23.53%, smaller than the maximum MFDX drawdown of -35.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVML and MFDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

QVML vs. MFDX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) at 3.03%. This indicates that QVML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...