QVML vs. MFDX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX).

QVML and MFDX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QVML is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Quality, Value &Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jun 30, 2021. MFDX is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index. It was launched on Aug 31, 2017. Both QVML and MFDX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

QVML vs. MFDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QVML vs. MFDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QVML Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF	-4.47%	17.74%	25.87%	22.19%	-16.25%	12.56%
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF	3.63%	34.27%	4.40%	17.54%	-10.27%	1.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVML achieves a -4.47% return, which is significantly lower than MFDX's 3.63% return.

QVML

• 1D: 2.74%
• 1M: -4.90%
• YTD: -4.47%
• 6M: -2.01%
• 1Y: 15.56%
• 3Y*: 17.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MFDX

• 1D: 3.05%
• 1M: -7.22%
• YTD: 3.63%
• 6M: 8.66%
• 1Y: 28.57%
• 3Y*: 16.66%
• 5Y*: 10.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVML vs. MFDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVML has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than MFDX's 0.39% expense ratio.

MFDX

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF

QVML

Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF

Return for Risk

QVML vs. MFDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVML

QVML Risk / Return Rank: 54
QVML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
QVML Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
QVML Omega Ratio Rank: 56
QVML Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
QVML Martin Ratio Rank: 64

MFDX

MFDX Risk / Return Rank: 88
MFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
MFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
MFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
MFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
MFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVML vs. MFDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QVML	MFDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	1.84	-1.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.32	2.47	-1.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.37	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	2.60	-1.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.20	10.63	-4.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QVML vs. MFDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVML Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the MFDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVML and MFDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QVML	MFDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	1.84	-1.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.51	+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between QVML and MFDX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

QVML vs. MFDX - Dividend Comparison

QVML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than MFDX's 2.86% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QVML Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF	1.15%	1.10%	1.15%	1.43%	1.72%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF	2.86%	2.97%	3.16%	3.12%	2.85%	2.99%	1.58%	2.88%	2.13%	0.71%

Drawdowns

QVML vs. MFDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVML drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, smaller than the maximum MFDX drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVML and MFDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QVML	MFDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.52%	-36.05%	+12.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.97%	-10.66%	-2.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.23%	-7.30%	+1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.57%	-6.58%	+1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	2.61%	+0.03%

Volatility

QVML vs. MFDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) is 5.17%, while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) has a volatility of 7.29%. This indicates that QVML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QVML	MFDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.17%	7.29%	-2.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.16%	10.27%	-1.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.56%	15.63%	+2.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.74%	14.95%	+1.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.74%	16.42%	+0.32%