QVML vs. MFDX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QVML (Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF) and MFDX (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QVML is a Multi-factor fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality, Value &Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while MFDX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QVML returned 21.14%/yr vs 18.33%/yr for MFDX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QVML charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for MFDX.

Performance

QVML vs. MFDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QVML having a 8.76% return and MFDX slightly lower at 8.71%.

QVML

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: -1.10%
• YTD: 8.76%
• 6M: 7.73%
• 1Y: 24.15%
• 3Y*: 21.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MFDX

• 1D: -1.84%
• 1M: -0.99%
• YTD: 8.71%
• 6M: 8.44%
• 1Y: 22.39%
• 3Y*: 18.33%
• 5Y*: 10.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVML vs. MFDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QVML Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF	8.76%	17.74%	25.87%	22.19%	-16.25%	12.72%
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF	8.71%	34.27%	4.40%	17.54%	-10.27%	1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between QVML and MFDX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021	0.73

The correlation between QVML and MFDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

QVML vs. MFDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QVML	MFDX
Technology	39.1%	7.8%
Financial Services	12.0%	16.5%
Communication Services	11.3%	7.1%
Healthcare	8.5%	5.8%
Industrials	8.2%	19.6%
Consumer Cyclical	7.0%	8.9%
Consumer Defensive	5.1%	7.7%
Energy	3.2%	6.4%
Utilities	2.2%	6.1%
Basic Materials	1.8%	11.2%
Real Estate	1.5%	2.9%

Return for Risk

QVML vs. MFDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVML

QVML Risk / Return Rank: 64
QVML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
QVML Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
QVML Omega Ratio Rank: 62
QVML Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
QVML Martin Ratio Rank: 71

MFDX

MFDX Risk / Return Rank: 48
MFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
MFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
MFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
MFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
MFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVML vs. MFDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QVML	MFDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	1.58	+0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	2.22	+0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.29	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	2.11	+0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.59	8.26	+4.33

QVML vs. MFDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVML Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the MFDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVML and MFDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QVML vs. MFDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVML drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, smaller than the maximum MFDX drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVML and MFDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QVML	MFDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.52%	-36.05%	+12.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.73%	-10.66%	+1.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.71%	-11.62%	-7.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.73%	-2.75%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.36%	-6.47%	+1.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	2.72%	-0.80%

Volatility

QVML vs. MFDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) is 4.54%, while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that QVML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QVML	MFDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.54%	4.94%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.80%	12.11%	-2.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.19%	14.27%	-2.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.61%	15.11%	+1.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.61%	16.43%	+0.18%

QVML vs. MFDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVML has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than MFDX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

QVML vs. MFDX - Dividend Comparison

QVML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than MFDX's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF	2.82%	2.97%	3.16%	3.12%	2.85%	2.99%	1.58%	2.88%	2.13%	0.71%
QVML Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF	1.03%	1.10%	1.15%	1.43%	1.72%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QVML and MFDX in my portfolio?

QVML and MFDX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QVML or MFDX?

MFDX has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to QVML (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVML dropped -23.52% vs MFDX's -36.05%.

Which ETF is better, QVML or MFDX?

On 3-year performance, QVML leads with 21.14% vs 18.33% for MFDX. On fees, QVML is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, QVML has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QVML or MFDX?

Over the 3-year period, QVML has performed better with a 21.14% return vs 18.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QVML or MFDX?

QVML is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MFDX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QVML or MFDX?

MFDX has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 1.03% for QVML.

What is the main difference between QVML and MFDX?

QVML is categorized as Multi-factor, while MFDX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. QVML tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value &Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while MFDX tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for QVML and 0.39% for MFDX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QVML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.