MFDX vs. FNDF
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF).
MFDX and FNDF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MFDX is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index. It was launched on Aug 31, 2017. FNDF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both MFDX and FNDF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MFDX or FNDF.
Key characteristics
| MFDX | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 6.65% | 3.96% |
| 1Y Return | 16.52% | 13.41% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.55% | 4.44% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 6.66% | 7.16% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.40 | 1.08 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.99 | 1.51 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.24 | 1.19 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.47 | 1.77 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.76 | 5.80 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.20% | 2.39% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.18% | 12.90% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.50% | -40.14% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.91% | -7.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFDX and FNDF is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
MFDX vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MFDX achieves a 6.65% return, which is significantly higher than FNDF's 3.96% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MFDX vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFDX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MFDX vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MFDX vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison
MFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than FNDF's 3.13% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 3.18% | 3.12% | 2.85% | 2.99% | 1.58% | 2.88% | 2.98% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 3.13% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% | 1.83% | 0.48% |
Drawdowns
MFDX vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFDX drawdown since its inception was -35.50%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFDX and FNDF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MFDX vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) is 3.77%, while Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that MFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.