PortfoliosLab logo
QVML vs. QVMS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QVML and QVMS is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

QVML vs. QVMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QVML:

0.66

QVMS:

0.01

Sortino Ratio

QVML:

1.06

QVMS:

0.18

Omega Ratio

QVML:

1.16

QVMS:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

QVML:

0.70

QVMS:

-0.00

Martin Ratio

QVML:

2.77

QVMS:

-0.00

Ulcer Index

QVML:

4.74%

QVMS:

10.05%

Daily Std Dev

QVML:

19.83%

QVMS:

24.40%

Max Drawdown

QVML:

-23.53%

QVMS:

-28.05%

Current Drawdown

QVML:

-3.07%

QVMS:

-14.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVML achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than QVMS's -6.17% return.


QVML

YTD

2.13%

1M

12.12%

6M

1.54%

1Y

13.02%

3Y*

16.18%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QVMS

YTD

-6.17%

1M

11.64%

6M

-10.19%

1Y

0.22%

3Y*

6.66%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QVML vs. QVMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVML has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than QVMS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

QVML vs. QVMS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVML
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QVML is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QVML is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QVML is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QVML is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QVML is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QVML is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

QVMS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QVMS is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QVMS is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QVMS is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QVMS is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QVMS is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QVMS is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QVML vs. QVMS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current QVML Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the QVMS Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVML and QVMS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

QVML vs. QVMS - Dividend Comparison

QVML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than QVMS's 1.48% yield.


TTM2024202320222021
QVML
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
1.18%1.15%1.43%1.72%0.62%
QVMS
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF
1.48%1.53%1.51%1.58%0.64%

Drawdowns

QVML vs. QVMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVML drawdown since its inception was -23.53%, smaller than the maximum QVMS drawdown of -28.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVML and QVMS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

QVML vs. QVMS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) is 4.51%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that QVML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QVMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...