MFDX vs. VXUS
MFDX (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFDX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MFDX returned 9.94%/yr vs 8.24%/yr for VXUS. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MFDX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
MFDX vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFDX achieves a 9.89% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 13.24% return.
MFDX
- 1D
- 2.81%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- YTD
- 9.89%
- 6M
- 11.08%
- 1Y
- 22.69%
- 3Y*
- 18.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.94%
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- 3.33%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 13.24%
- 6M
- 14.27%
- 1Y
- 28.59%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
MFDX vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 9.89% | 34.27% | 4.40% | 17.54% | -10.27% | 11.07% | 6.90% | 19.88% | -14.88% | 7.07% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 13.24% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 21.75% | -14.43% | 7.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFDX and VXUS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017 | 0.94 |
The correlation between MFDX and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
MFDX vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MFDX
VXUS
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
Industrials
MFDX
VXUS
Financial Services
MFDX
VXUS
Basic Materials
MFDX
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
MFDX
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
MFDX
VXUS
Technology
MFDX
VXUS
Communication Services
MFDX
VXUS
Energy
MFDX
VXUS
Utilities
MFDX
VXUS
Healthcare
MFDX
VXUS
Real Estate
MFDX
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFDX vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
MFDX
VXUS
MFDX vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFDX | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.33 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 2.55 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.36 | 9.77 | -1.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFDX vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFDX drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, roughly equal to the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFDX and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFDX | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.05% | -35.97% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.66% | -11.27% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.62% | -13.58% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.58% | -29.44% | +3.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.70% | -1.86% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.49% | -8.21% | +1.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 2.93% | -0.21% |
Volatility
MFDX vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) is 5.14%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 6.78%. This indicates that MFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFDX | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 6.78% | -1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.98% | 14.05% | -2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.23% | 16.09% | -1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.12% | 16.21% | -1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.44% | 17.20% | -0.76% |
MFDX vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFDX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFDX vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
MFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than VXUS's 2.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 2.79% | 2.97% | 3.16% | 3.12% | 2.85% | 2.99% | 1.58% | 2.88% | 2.13% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.68% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, MFDX and VXUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VXUS has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to MFDX (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFDX dropped -36.05% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 5-year performance, MFDX leads with 9.94% vs 8.24% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MFDX has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MFDX has performed better with a 9.94% return vs 8.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MFDX.
MFDX has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 2.68% for VXUS.
MFDX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. MFDX tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MFDX and 0.05% for VXUS.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFDX and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer