QVML vs. VFMF
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF).
QVML and VFMF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QVML is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Quality, Value &Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jun 30, 2021. VFMF is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Feb 13, 2018.
Performance
QVML vs. VFMF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QVML vs. VFMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVML Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF | -3.64% | 17.74% | 25.87% | 22.19% | -16.25% | 12.56% |
VFMF Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF | 4.17% | 17.38% | 15.60% | 18.52% | -5.70% | 7.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QVML achieves a -3.64% return, which is significantly lower than VFMF's 4.17% return.
QVML
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -4.27%
- YTD
- -3.64%
- 6M
- -1.37%
- 1Y
- 16.19%
- 3Y*
- 18.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFMF
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- 4.17%
- 6M
- 9.32%
- 1Y
- 25.37%
- 3Y*
- 18.45%
- 5Y*
- 11.84%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QVML vs. VFMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVML has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than VFMF's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
QVML vs. VFMF — Risk / Return Rank
QVML
VFMF
QVML vs. VFMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QVML | VFMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 1.36 | -0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 1.94 | -0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.29 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 1.94 | -0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.24 | 8.92 | -2.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QVML | VFMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 1.36 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.52 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between QVML and VFMF is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QVML vs. VFMF - Dividend Comparison
QVML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than VFMF's 1.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVML Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 1.14% | 1.10% | 1.15% | 1.43% | 1.72% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFMF Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF | 1.52% | 1.54% | 1.60% | 1.78% | 2.21% | 1.39% | 1.56% | 1.61% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
QVML vs. VFMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVML drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, smaller than the maximum VFMF drawdown of -41.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVML and VFMF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVML | VFMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.52% | -41.34% | +17.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.97% | -13.32% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.40% | -4.21% | -1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.57% | -5.85% | +0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 2.90% | -0.24% |
Volatility
QVML vs. VFMF - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) at 4.65%. This indicates that QVML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QVML | VFMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.22% | 4.65% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.19% | 10.08% | -0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.57% | 18.80% | -0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 18.25% | -1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 21.31% | -4.58% |