MFDX vs. JQUA
MFDX (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF) and JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFDX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index, while JQUA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MFDX returned 10.12%/yr vs 13.08%/yr for JQUA. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFDX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JQUA.
Performance
MFDX vs. JQUA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFDX achieves a 8.71% return, which is significantly lower than JQUA's 11.30% return.
MFDX
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- 8.71%
- 6M
- 8.44%
- 1Y
- 22.39%
- 3Y*
- 18.33%
- 5Y*
- 10.12%
- 10Y*
- —
JQUA
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 11.30%
- 6M
- 10.20%
- 1Y
- 20.17%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.08%
- 10Y*
- —
MFDX vs. JQUA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 8.71% | 34.27% | 4.40% | 17.54% | -10.27% | 11.07% | 6.90% | 19.88% | -14.88% | 2.31% |
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 11.30% | 11.69% | 21.21% | 25.13% | -13.45% | 28.68% | 16.56% | 28.47% | -2.98% | 5.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFDX and JQUA is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | 0.72 |
The correlation between MFDX and JQUA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
MFDX vs. JQUA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MFDX
JQUA
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
Industrials
MFDX
JQUA
Financial Services
MFDX
JQUA
Basic Materials
MFDX
JQUA
Consumer Cyclical
MFDX
JQUA
Technology
MFDX
JQUA
Consumer Defensive
MFDX
JQUA
Communication Services
MFDX
JQUA
Energy
MFDX
JQUA
Utilities
MFDX
JQUA
Healthcare
MFDX
JQUA
Real Estate
MFDX
JQUA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFDX vs. JQUA — Risk / Return Rank
MFDX
JQUA
MFDX vs. JQUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFDX | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.29 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 2.84 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.26 | 11.58 | -3.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFDX vs. JQUA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFDX drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, which is greater than JQUA's maximum drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFDX and JQUA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFDX | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.05% | -32.92% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.66% | -7.13% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.62% | -16.81% | +5.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.58% | -22.47% | -3.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -2.77% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.47% | -4.15% | -2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 1.75% | +0.97% |
Volatility
MFDX vs. JQUA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) is 4.94%, while JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) has a volatility of 5.52%. This indicates that MFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JQUA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFDX | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | 5.52% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.11% | 9.51% | +2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.27% | 12.05% | +2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.11% | 15.74% | -0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.43% | 18.01% | -1.58% |
MFDX vs. JQUA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFDX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than JQUA's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFDX vs. JQUA - Dividend Comparison
MFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than JQUA's 1.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.10% | 1.19% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 2.10% | 0.40% |
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 2.82% | 2.97% | 3.16% | 3.12% | 2.85% | 2.99% | 1.58% | 2.88% | 2.13% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFDX and JQUA have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JQUA has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to MFDX (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFDX dropped -36.05% vs JQUA's -32.92%.
On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 13.08% vs 10.12% for MFDX. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MFDX has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 13.08% return vs 10.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MFDX.
MFDX has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 1.10% for JQUA.
MFDX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while JQUA is Large Cap Blend Equities. MFDX tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index, while JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MFDX and 0.12% for JQUA.
JQUA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFDX and JQUA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer