PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFDX vs. AVLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFDX vs. AVLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFDX achieves a 10.75% return, which is significantly lower than AVLV's 20.57% return.


MFDX

1D
0.24%
1M
0.87%
YTD
10.75%
6M
11.18%
1Y
25.78%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*

AVLV

1D
-1.02%
1M
1.99%
YTD
20.57%
6M
19.54%
1Y
37.53%
3Y*
22.67%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFDX vs. AVLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MFDX
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF
10.75%34.27%4.40%17.54%-10.27%0.16%
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
20.57%15.12%17.49%17.43%-5.53%6.27%

Correlation

The correlation between MFDX and AVLV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021

0.75

The correlation between MFDX and AVLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

MFDX vs. AVLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MFDX
AVLV

Industrials

19.6%
15.4%

Financial Services

16.5%
16.3%

Basic Materials

11.2%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
14.1%

Technology

7.8%
17.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
7.7%

Communication Services

7.1%
6.9%

Energy

6.4%
14.4%

Utilities

6.1%
0.3%

Healthcare

5.8%
5.6%

Real Estate

2.9%
0.1%

Industrials

MFDX
19.6%
AVLV
15.4%

Financial Services

MFDX
16.5%
AVLV
16.3%

Basic Materials

MFDX
11.2%
AVLV
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MFDX
8.9%
AVLV
14.1%

Technology

MFDX
7.8%
AVLV
17.2%

Consumer Defensive

MFDX
7.7%
AVLV
7.7%

Communication Services

MFDX
7.1%
AVLV
6.9%

Energy

MFDX
6.4%
AVLV
14.4%

Utilities

MFDX
6.1%
AVLV
0.3%

Healthcare

MFDX
5.8%
AVLV
5.6%

Real Estate

MFDX
2.9%
AVLV
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFDX vs. AVLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFDX
MFDX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
MFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

AVLV
AVLV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFDX vs. AVLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFDXAVLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.53

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

5.90

-3.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.53

23.36

-13.83

MFDX vs. AVLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the AVLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFDX and AVLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFDX vs. AVLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFDX drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, which is greater than AVLV's maximum drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFDX and AVLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFDXAVLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.05%

-19.50%

-16.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-6.39%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.62%

-19.50%

+7.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-1.30%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.47%

-3.89%

-2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

1.61%

+1.10%

Volatility

MFDX vs. AVLV - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) at 3.99%. This indicates that MFDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFDXAVLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

3.99%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

9.41%

+2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.16%

12.60%

+1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.09%

17.33%

-2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.42%

17.33%

-0.91%

MFDX vs. AVLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFDX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than AVLV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFDX vs. AVLV - Dividend Comparison

MFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than AVLV's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
1.38%1.33%1.58%1.85%2.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MFDX
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF
2.77%2.97%3.16%3.12%2.85%2.99%1.58%2.88%2.13%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFDX and AVLV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFDX has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to AVLV (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFDX dropped -36.05% vs AVLV's -19.50%.

On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 22.67% vs 19.06% for MFDX. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 22.67% return vs 19.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MFDX.

MFDX has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 1.38% for AVLV.

MFDX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while AVLV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MFDX and 0.15% for AVLV.

AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFDX and AVLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer