QVML vs. QUS
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS).
QVML and QUS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QVML is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Quality, Value &Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jun 30, 2021. QUS is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). It was launched on Apr 16, 2015. Both QVML and QUS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QVML or QUS.
Correlation
The correlation between QVML and QUS is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
QVML vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
QVML:
2.00
QUS:
2.01
QVML:
2.68
QUS:
2.82
QVML:
1.36
QUS:
1.37
QVML:
2.97
QUS:
3.65
QVML:
12.46
QUS:
10.35
QVML:
2.03%
QUS:
1.97%
QVML:
12.69%
QUS:
10.13%
QVML:
-23.53%
QUS:
-33.78%
QVML:
0.00%
QUS:
-0.29%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QVML having a 4.89% return and QUS slightly higher at 4.95%.
QVML
4.89%
2.84%
10.88%
24.13%
N/A
N/A
QUS
4.95%
2.96%
7.38%
19.07%
12.27%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QVML vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVML has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QVML vs. QUS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
QVML
QUS
QVML vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QVML vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
QVML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than QUS's 1.42% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVML Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 1.10% | 1.15% | 1.43% | 1.72% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.42% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
Drawdowns
QVML vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVML drawdown since its inception was -23.53%, smaller than the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVML and QUS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QVML vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) has a higher volatility of 3.11% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 2.00%. This indicates that QVML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.