QQUP vs. NOBL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQUP (ProShares Ultra Top QQQ) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQUP is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Mega Index (200%), while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQUP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.

Performance

QQUP vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQUP achieves a 14.50% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 3.51% return.

QQUP

• 1D: -3.99%
• 1M: 7.57%
• YTD: 14.50%
• 6M: 8.63%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NOBL

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 1.01%
• YTD: 3.51%
• 6M: 3.45%
• 1Y: 9.00%
• 3Y*: 8.01%
• 5Y*: 5.03%
• 10Y*: 9.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQUP vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQUP ProShares Ultra Top QQQ	14.50%	44.45%
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	3.51%	4.73%

Correlation

The correlation between QQUP and NOBL is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025	0.05

Return for Risk

QQUP vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOBL

NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 22
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 20
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQUP vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQUP	NOBL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.77	0.64	+1.13

Drawdowns

QQUP vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQUP drawdown since its inception was -37.67%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQUP and NOBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQUP	NOBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.67%	-35.43%	-2.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.11%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.36%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.92%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.42%	-5.99%	-0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.20%	-3.48%	-5.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.50%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQUP	NOBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.36%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.52%	11.33%	+27.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.52%	14.38%	+24.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.52%	16.60%	+21.92%

QQUP vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQUP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQUP vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

QQUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than NOBL's 2.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.12%	2.14%	2.05%	2.09%	1.94%	1.89%	2.14%	1.89%	2.37%	1.74%	2.13%	2.02%
QQUP ProShares Ultra Top QQQ	0.42%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQUP and NOBL in my portfolio?

QQUP and NOBL have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQUP or NOBL?

On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQUP or NOBL?

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QQUP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQUP or NOBL?

NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.42% for QQUP.

What is the main difference between QQUP and NOBL?

QQUP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. QQUP tracks Nasdaq-100 Mega Index (200%), while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QQUP and 0.35% for NOBL.