PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQUP vs. GDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQUP vs. GDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra QQQ Mega (QQUP) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQUP achieves a 4.80% return, which is significantly higher than GDE's -0.84% return.


QQUP

1D
5.18%
1M
5.80%
6M
8.22%
YTD
4.80%
1Y
30.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
44.94%

GDE

1D
-0.71%
1M
-1.55%
6M
-11.26%
YTD
-0.84%
1Y
33.38%
3Y*
38.84%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
29.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.75M$8.80M$9.79M
$165.72K$145.63K$549.78K

QQUP vs. GDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QQUP and GDE is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.50

The correlation between QQUP and GDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQUP vs. GDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQUP
QQUP Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
QQUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQUP Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
QQUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQUP Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

GDE
GDE Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
GDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDE Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQUP vs. GDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ Mega (QQUP) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQUPGDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.21

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

1.49

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.55

3.27

-1.71

QQUP vs. GDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQUP Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the GDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQUP and GDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQUP vs. GDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQUP drawdown since its inception was -37.67%, which is greater than GDE's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQUP and GDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQUPGDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.67%

-32.01%

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.67%

-22.66%

-15.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.34%

-19.77%

+5.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.32%

-8.25%

-2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.78%

10.30%

+4.48%

Volatility

QQUP vs. GDE - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra QQQ Mega (QQUP) has a higher volatility of 14.50% compared to WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) at 7.99%. This indicates that QQUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQUPGDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.50%

7.99%

+6.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.95%

26.11%

+6.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.34%

31.06%

+11.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.78%

27.12%

+13.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.78%

27.12%

+13.66%

QQUP vs. GDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQUP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GDE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQUP vs. GDE - Dividend Comparison

QQUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than GDE's 4.36% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
4.36%4.32%7.14%2.22%0.81%
QQUP
ProShares Ultra QQQ Mega
0.63%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQUP and GDE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQUP has higher volatility (14.50%) compared to GDE (7.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQUP dropped -37.67% vs GDE's -32.01%.

On 1-year performance, GDE leads with 33.38% vs 30.22% for QQUP. On fees, GDE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GDE has been the lower-risk option at 7.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GDE has performed better with a 33.38% return vs 30.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QQUP.

GDE has the higher dividend yield at 4.36%, compared with 0.63% for QQUP.

QQUP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GDE is Gold. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QQUP and 0.20% for GDE.

GDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQUP and GDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer