PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQ vs. FDIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQ vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 17.57% return, which is significantly higher than FDIS's 0.01% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed FDIS with an annualized return of 21.79%, while FDIS has yielded a comparatively lower 13.98% annualized return.


QQQ

1D
0.59%
1M
0.22%
YTD
17.57%
6M
17.85%
1Y
37.55%
3Y*
26.43%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
21.79%

FDIS

1D
0.20%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.01%
6M
-1.14%
1Y
12.39%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
17.57%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.01%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-0.88%22.96%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ and FDIS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.83

The correlation between QQQ and FDIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQQ vs. FDIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQ
FDIS

Technology

53.8%
0.9%

Communication Services

15.8%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
96.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
1.0%

Healthcare

4.2%
0.1%

Industrials

2.8%
0.8%

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%

-

Energy

0.6%

-

Financial Services

0.2%
0.1%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.1%

Technology

QQQ
53.8%
FDIS
0.9%

Communication Services

QQQ
15.8%
FDIS
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQ
12.3%
FDIS
96.9%

Consumer Defensive

QQQ
7.7%
FDIS
1.0%

Healthcare

QQQ
4.2%
FDIS
0.1%

Industrials

QQQ
2.8%
FDIS
0.8%

Utilities

QQQ
1.4%
FDIS

-

Basic Materials

QQQ
1.1%
FDIS

-

Energy

QQQ
0.6%
FDIS

-

Financial Services

QQQ
0.2%
FDIS
0.1%

Real Estate

QQQ
0.1%
FDIS
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQ vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQFDISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.11

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

0.72

+2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.22

2.24

+8.99

QQQ vs. FDIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the FDIS Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ and FDIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQ vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and FDIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQFDISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.97%

-39.16%

-43.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-15.50%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

-27.43%

+4.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

-39.16%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

-39.16%

+4.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.33%

-4.58%

+1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.75%

-7.49%

-25.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

5.01%

-1.81%

Volatility

QQQ vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) at 6.19%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQFDISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.56%

6.19%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.81%

13.44%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

18.52%

-1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.55%

23.92%

-1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.38%

22.32%

+0.06%

QQQ vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQQ vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison

QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than FDIS's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.73%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.39%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQ and FDIS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to FDIS (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs FDIS's -39.16%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.79% vs 13.98% for FDIS. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FDIS has been the lower-risk option at 6.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.79% return vs 13.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.

FDIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.39% for QQQ.

QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while FDIS is Consumer Discretionary Equities. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.08% for FDIS.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQ and FDIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer