QQQ vs. QQQI
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QQQ is passively managed, while QQQI is actively managed. Over the past year, QQQ returned 35.82% vs 25.86% for QQQI. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.
Performance
QQQ vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 17.57% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 10.58% return.
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 17.57%
- 6M
- 17.85%
- 1Y
- 35.82%
- 3Y*
- 26.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.85%
- 10Y*
- 21.79%
QQQI
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 10.58%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- 25.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 17.57% | 20.77% | 20.11% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 10.58% | 18.62% | 19.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and QQQI is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.98 |
The correlation between QQQ and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQQ vs. QQQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQ
QQQI
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QQQ
QQQI
Communication Services
QQQ
QQQI
Consumer Cyclical
QQQ
QQQI
Consumer Defensive
QQQ
QQQI
Healthcare
QQQ
QQQI
Industrials
QQQ
QQQI
Utilities
QQQ
QQQI
Basic Materials
QQQ
QQQI
Energy
QQQ
QQQI
Financial Services
QQQ
QQQI
Real Estate
QQQ
QQQI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
QQQI
QQQ vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQ | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.34 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 2.70 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.22 | 11.63 | -0.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -20.00% | -62.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -9.61% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.33% | -2.69% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.75% | -2.21% | -30.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 2.23% | +0.97% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 6.10%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 6.10% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.81% | 11.35% | +2.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.19% | 14.10% | +3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 17.34% | +5.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.38% | 17.34% | +5.04% |
QQQ vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQ vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than QQQI's 13.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.53% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, QQQ and QQQI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQQ has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to QQQI (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs QQQI's -20.00%.
On 1-year performance, QQQ leads with 35.82% vs 25.86% for QQQI. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQI has been the lower-risk option at 6.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 35.82% return vs 25.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.
QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.53%, compared with 0.39% for QQQ.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.68% for QQQI.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer