QQH vs. SNSR
Compare and contrast key facts about HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR).
QQH and SNSR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQH is a passively managed fund by Howard Capital Management that tracks the performance of the HCM Defender 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 10, 2019. SNSR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016. Both QQH and SNSR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QQH vs. SNSR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QQH vs. SNSR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF | -9.15% | 15.66% | 33.64% | 48.05% | -39.60% | 37.52% | 41.71% | 15.13% |
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF | 1.79% | 6.46% | -0.45% | 23.06% | -25.50% | 23.66% | 35.05% | 17.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQH achieves a -9.15% return, which is significantly lower than SNSR's 1.79% return.
QQH
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -6.36%
- YTD
- -9.15%
- 6M
- -8.25%
- 1Y
- 19.48%
- 3Y*
- 21.60%
- 5Y*
- 10.69%
- 10Y*
- —
SNSR
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -7.19%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- -3.48%
- 1Y
- 15.05%
- 3Y*
- 4.86%
- 5Y*
- 2.79%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QQH vs. SNSR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQH has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SNSR's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QQH vs. SNSR — Risk / Return Rank
QQH
SNSR
QQH vs. SNSR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQH | SNSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 0.50 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.29 | 0.93 | +0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.13 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 0.86 | +0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.73 | 2.85 | +0.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQH | SNSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 0.50 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.11 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.44 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between QQH and SNSR is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QQH vs. SNSR - Dividend Comparison
QQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than SNSR's 0.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF | 0.23% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF | 0.53% | 0.54% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 0.82% | 0.43% | 0.21% | 1.12% | 1.25% | 1.11% | 0.31% |
Drawdowns
QQH vs. SNSR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQH drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, which is greater than SNSR's maximum drawdown of -38.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQH and SNSR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQH | SNSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.87% | -38.46% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | -17.17% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.87% | -38.03% | -3.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.34% | -8.08% | -6.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.14% | -9.64% | -3.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.49% | 5.20% | +0.29% |
Volatility
QQH vs. SNSR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) is 6.41%, while Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) has a volatility of 8.61%. This indicates that QQH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNSR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QQH | SNSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 8.61% | -2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.70% | 17.15% | -0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.37% | 30.15% | -7.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 24.79% | -3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.86% | 24.54% | +0.32% |