PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLD vs. MIDU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLD vs. MIDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a 32.65% return, which is significantly lower than MIDU's 41.54% return. Over the past 10 years, QLD has outperformed MIDU with an annualized return of 35.67%, while MIDU has yielded a comparatively lower 12.76% annualized return.


QLD

1D
1.30%
1M
2.58%
YTD
32.65%
6M
32.82%
1Y
73.89%
3Y*
44.57%
5Y*
23.24%
10Y*
35.67%

MIDU

1D
1.98%
1M
14.92%
YTD
41.54%
6M
35.51%
1Y
74.97%
3Y*
23.88%
5Y*
2.68%
10Y*
12.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLD vs. MIDU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
32.65%30.36%42.82%117.72%-60.52%54.67%88.90%81.69%-8.31%70.34%
MIDU
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares
41.54%-2.75%20.32%27.79%-49.27%72.89%-18.31%77.38%-39.21%46.86%

Correlation

The correlation between QLD and MIDU is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2009

0.75

The correlation between QLD and MIDU shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QLD vs. MIDU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QLD
MIDU

Technology

58.7%
3.9%

Communication Services

14.3%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
0.9%

Healthcare

3.7%
2.0%

Industrials

2.6%
5.6%

Utilities

1.2%
0.6%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.1%

Energy

0.5%
1.1%

Financial Services

0.2%
2.9%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.6%

Technology

QLD
58.7%
MIDU
3.9%

Communication Services

QLD
14.3%
MIDU
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

QLD
11.4%
MIDU
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

QLD
6.4%
MIDU
0.9%

Healthcare

QLD
3.7%
MIDU
2.0%

Industrials

QLD
2.6%
MIDU
5.6%

Utilities

QLD
1.2%
MIDU
0.6%

Basic Materials

QLD
1.0%
MIDU
1.1%

Energy

QLD
0.5%
MIDU
1.1%

Financial Services

QLD
0.2%
MIDU
2.9%

Real Estate

QLD
0.1%
MIDU
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLD vs. MIDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLD
QLD Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

MIDU
MIDU Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
MIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLD vs. MIDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QLDMIDUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.24

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

2.61

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.46

8.65

+0.81

QLD vs. MIDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the MIDU Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLD and MIDU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QLD vs. MIDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, roughly equal to the maximum MIDU drawdown of -86.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and MIDU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLDMIDUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.13%

-86.26%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.13%

-25.80%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.29%

-60.41%

+18.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.68%

-64.14%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.68%

-86.26%

+22.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.11%

-1.48%

-5.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.16%

-22.41%

+4.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.36%

7.77%

-0.41%

Volatility

QLD vs. MIDU - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) have volatilities of 15.14% and 15.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLDMIDUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.14%

15.07%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.51%

34.90%

-7.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.29%

47.43%

-13.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.07%

59.59%

-14.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.73%

63.65%

-18.92%

QLD vs. MIDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MIDU's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLD vs. MIDU - Dividend Comparison

QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than MIDU's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIDU
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.63%1.04%1.10%1.43%0.11%0.00%0.06%0.71%0.70%2.67%1.89%0.00%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.13%0.17%0.25%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.21%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLD and MIDU have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QLD has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to MIDU (15.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLD dropped -83.13% vs MIDU's -86.26%.

On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 35.67% vs 12.76% for MIDU. On fees, QLD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 35.67% return vs 12.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QLD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MIDU.

MIDU has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.13% for QLD.

QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while MIDU tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QLD and 1.06% for MIDU.

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLD and MIDU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer