MIDU vs. UMDD
MIDU (Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares) and UMDD (ProShares UltraPro MidCap400) are both Leveraged Equities funds tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), from Direxion and ProShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MIDU returned 12.98%/yr vs 13.11%/yr for UMDD. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MIDU charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UMDD.
Performance
MIDU vs. UMDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MIDU having a 37.67% return and UMDD slightly higher at 38.16%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MIDU having a 12.98% annualized return and UMDD not far ahead at 13.11%.
MIDU
- 1D
- -3.21%
- 1M
- 6.62%
- YTD
- 37.67%
- 6M
- 30.01%
- 1Y
- 63.47%
- 3Y*
- 26.25%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.98%
UMDD
- 1D
- -2.96%
- 1M
- 7.10%
- YTD
- 38.16%
- 6M
- 30.23%
- 1Y
- 64.17%
- 3Y*
- 25.89%
- 5Y*
- 3.07%
- 10Y*
- 13.11%
MIDU vs. UMDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDU Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares | 37.67% | -2.75% | 20.32% | 27.79% | -49.27% | 72.89% | -18.31% | 77.38% | -39.21% | 46.86% |
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 | 38.16% | -2.57% | 19.68% | 27.21% | -49.60% | 72.27% | -17.30% | 78.90% | -40.29% | 49.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIDU and UMDD is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.99 |
The correlation between MIDU and UMDD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
MIDU vs. UMDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MIDU
UMDD
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
MIDU
UMDD
Technology
MIDU
UMDD
Financial Services
MIDU
UMDD
Consumer Cyclical
MIDU
UMDD
Healthcare
MIDU
UMDD
Real Estate
MIDU
UMDD
Energy
MIDU
UMDD
Basic Materials
MIDU
UMDD
Consumer Defensive
MIDU
UMDD
Utilities
MIDU
UMDD
Communication Services
MIDU
UMDD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIDU vs. UMDD — Risk / Return Rank
MIDU
UMDD
MIDU vs. UMDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) and ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MIDU | UMDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 2.48 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.20 | 8.28 | -0.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MIDU vs. UMDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIDU drawdown since its inception was -86.26%, roughly equal to the maximum UMDD drawdown of -86.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDU and UMDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIDU | UMDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.26% | -86.24% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.80% | -26.04% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.41% | -60.33% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.14% | -64.61% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.26% | -86.24% | -0.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.17% | -5.38% | +1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.38% | -23.55% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.77% | 7.77% | 0.00% |
Volatility
MIDU vs. UMDD - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) and ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) have volatilities of 13.97% and 13.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIDU | UMDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.97% | 13.54% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.92% | 35.31% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.39% | 47.51% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.50% | 58.96% | +0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.57% | 62.23% | +1.34% |
MIDU vs. UMDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIDU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than UMDD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MIDU vs. UMDD - Dividend Comparison
MIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than UMDD's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDU Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares | 0.65% | 1.04% | 1.10% | 1.43% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.71% | 0.70% | 2.67% | 1.89% | 0.00% |
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 | 0.76% | 1.00% | 0.76% | 0.19% | 0.49% | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.64% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, MIDU and UMDD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MIDU has higher volatility (13.97%) compared to UMDD (13.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDU dropped -86.26% vs UMDD's -86.24%.
On 10-year performance, UMDD leads with 13.11% vs 12.98% for MIDU. On fees, UMDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UMDD has been the lower-risk option at 13.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UMDD has performed better with a 13.11% return vs 12.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UMDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MIDU.
UMDD has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.65% for MIDU.
Both ETFs track S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MIDU and 0.95% for UMDD.
UMDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MIDU and UMDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer