PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIDU vs. TNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIDU vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDU achieves a 37.67% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 56.90% return. Over the past 10 years, MIDU has outperformed TNA with an annualized return of 12.98%, while TNA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.70% annualized return.


MIDU

1D
-3.21%
1M
6.62%
YTD
37.67%
6M
30.01%
1Y
63.47%
3Y*
26.25%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
12.98%

TNA

1D
-3.11%
1M
9.59%
YTD
56.90%
6M
45.88%
1Y
125.39%
3Y*
32.32%
5Y*
-5.98%
10Y*
9.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDU vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIDU
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares
37.67%-2.75%20.32%27.79%-49.27%72.89%-18.31%77.38%-39.21%46.86%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
56.90%9.82%7.21%26.24%-62.48%27.88%-7.82%71.88%-39.89%39.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDU and TNA is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2009

0.95

The correlation between MIDU and TNA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

MIDU vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MIDU
TNA

Industrials

5.3%
18.0%

Technology

3.4%
19.1%

Financial Services

2.8%
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

2.0%
8.0%

Healthcare

1.8%
16.3%

Real Estate

1.5%
5.9%

Energy

1.0%
5.4%

Basic Materials

1.0%
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
2.3%

Utilities

0.6%
2.7%

Communication Services

0.2%
2.4%

Industrials

MIDU
5.3%
TNA
18.0%

Technology

MIDU
3.4%
TNA
19.1%

Financial Services

MIDU
2.8%
TNA
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MIDU
2.0%
TNA
8.0%

Healthcare

MIDU
1.8%
TNA
16.3%

Real Estate

MIDU
1.5%
TNA
5.9%

Energy

MIDU
1.0%
TNA
5.4%

Basic Materials

MIDU
1.0%
TNA
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

MIDU
0.8%
TNA
2.3%

Utilities

MIDU
0.6%
TNA
2.7%

Communication Services

MIDU
0.2%
TNA
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIDU vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDU
MIDU Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

TNA
TNA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDU vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIDUTNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.31

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

3.88

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.20

12.72

-4.53

MIDU vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDU Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDU and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIDU vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDU drawdown since its inception was -86.26%, roughly equal to the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDU and TNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIDUTNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.26%

-88.09%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.80%

-32.53%

+6.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.41%

-65.78%

+5.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.14%

-82.36%

+18.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.26%

-88.09%

+1.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.17%

-33.64%

+29.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.38%

-33.92%

+11.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.77%

9.89%

-2.12%

Volatility

MIDU vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) is 13.97%, while Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a volatility of 19.82%. This indicates that MIDU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIDUTNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.97%

19.82%

-5.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.92%

42.69%

-7.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.39%

58.76%

-11.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.50%

67.57%

-8.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.57%

68.50%

-4.93%

MIDU vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than TNA's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIDU vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

MIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than TNA's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MIDU
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.65%1.04%1.10%1.43%0.11%0.00%0.06%0.71%0.70%2.67%1.89%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.38%0.78%0.93%1.27%0.31%0.06%0.03%0.44%0.36%0.15%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, MIDU and TNA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TNA has higher volatility (19.82%) compared to MIDU (13.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDU dropped -86.26% vs TNA's -88.09%.

On 10-year performance, MIDU leads with 12.98% vs 9.70% for TNA. On fees, TNA is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, MIDU has been the lower-risk option at 13.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MIDU has performed better with a 12.98% return vs 9.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TNA is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MIDU.

MIDU has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.38% for TNA.

MIDU tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MIDU and 1.05% for TNA.

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIDU and TNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer