PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIDU vs. MVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIDU vs. MVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) and ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDU achieves a 42.23% return, which is significantly higher than MVV's 29.16% return. Over the past 10 years, MIDU has underperformed MVV with an annualized return of 13.35%, while MVV has yielded a comparatively higher 14.63% annualized return.


MIDU

1D
1.17%
1M
10.15%
YTD
42.23%
6M
33.14%
1Y
73.64%
3Y*
27.63%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
13.35%

MVV

1D
0.77%
1M
7.10%
YTD
29.16%
6M
23.52%
1Y
49.79%
3Y*
23.02%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
14.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDU vs. MVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIDU
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares
42.23%-2.75%20.32%27.79%-49.27%72.89%-18.31%77.38%-39.21%46.86%
MVV
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400
29.16%3.48%17.75%22.51%-31.96%48.57%6.20%49.50%-25.44%30.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDU and MVV is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2009

0.99

The correlation between MIDU and MVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

MIDU vs. MVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MIDU
MVV

Industrials

5.3%
24.8%

Technology

3.4%
17.8%

Financial Services

2.8%
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

2.0%
10.5%

Healthcare

1.8%
9.1%

Real Estate

1.5%
7.3%

Energy

1.0%
4.9%

Basic Materials

1.0%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
3.3%

Utilities

0.6%
2.9%

Communication Services

0.2%
1.0%

Industrials

MIDU
5.3%
MVV
24.8%

Technology

MIDU
3.4%
MVV
17.8%

Financial Services

MIDU
2.8%
MVV
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

MIDU
2.0%
MVV
10.5%

Healthcare

MIDU
1.8%
MVV
9.1%

Real Estate

MIDU
1.5%
MVV
7.3%

Energy

MIDU
1.0%
MVV
4.9%

Basic Materials

MIDU
1.0%
MVV
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

MIDU
0.8%
MVV
3.3%

Utilities

MIDU
0.6%
MVV
2.9%

Communication Services

MIDU
0.2%
MVV
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIDU vs. MVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDU
MIDU Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

MVV
MVV Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
MVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVV Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVV Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDU vs. MVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) and ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIDUMVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.27

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

2.83

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.51

9.70

-0.18

MIDU vs. MVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDU Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the MVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDU and MVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIDU vs. MVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDU drawdown since its inception was -86.26%, roughly equal to the maximum MVV drawdown of -85.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDU and MVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIDUMVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.26%

-85.54%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.80%

-17.68%

-8.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.41%

-44.80%

-15.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.14%

-45.53%

-18.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.26%

-69.19%

-17.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-0.21%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.38%

-20.50%

-1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.76%

5.15%

+2.61%

Volatility

MIDU vs. MVV - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) has a higher volatility of 13.42% compared to ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) at 9.19%. This indicates that MIDU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIDUMVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.42%

9.19%

+4.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.76%

23.43%

+11.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.36%

31.87%

+15.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.48%

39.66%

+19.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.68%

42.41%

+21.27%

MIDU vs. MVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than MVV's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIDU vs. MVV - Dividend Comparison

MIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than MVV's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIDU
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.62%1.04%1.10%1.43%0.11%0.00%0.06%0.71%0.70%2.67%1.89%0.00%
MVV
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400
0.66%0.77%0.39%0.77%0.93%0.16%0.29%0.62%0.62%0.21%0.43%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, MIDU and MVV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MIDU has higher volatility (13.42%) compared to MVV (9.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDU dropped -86.26% vs MVV's -85.54%.

On 10-year performance, MVV leads with 14.63% vs 13.35% for MIDU. On fees, MVV is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MVV has been the lower-risk option at 9.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MVV has performed better with a 14.63% return vs 13.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MVV is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MIDU.

MVV has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.62% for MIDU.

MIDU tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while MVV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MIDU and 0.95% for MVV.

MVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIDU and MVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer