PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIDU vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIDU vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDU achieves a 35.81% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's 23.06% return. Over the past 10 years, MIDU has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 11.16%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 39.46% annualized return.


MIDU

1D
-0.43%
1M
-4.22%
6M
22.23%
YTD
35.81%
1Y
55.48%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
11.16%
ALL TIME*
21.79%

TQQQ

1D
2.09%
1M
-11.90%
6M
20.14%
YTD
23.06%
1Y
56.87%
3Y*
43.81%
5Y*
15.36%
10Y*
39.46%
ALL TIME*
42.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$996.89K$1.15M$1.50M
$4.37B$4.57B$5.33B

MIDU vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIDU
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares
35.81%-2.75%20.32%27.79%-49.27%72.89%-18.31%77.38%-39.21%46.86%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
23.06%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDU and TQQQ is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

0.74

The correlation between MIDU and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

MIDU vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MIDU
TQQQ

Industrials

5.0%
2.8%

Technology

3.6%
53.8%

Financial Services

3.3%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

2.4%
12.3%

Healthcare

2.4%
4.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.6%
1.1%

Energy

1.2%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
7.7%

Utilities

0.7%
1.4%

Communication Services

0.4%
15.8%

Industrials

MIDU
5.0%
TQQQ
2.8%

Technology

MIDU
3.6%
TQQQ
53.8%

Financial Services

MIDU
3.3%
TQQQ
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

MIDU
2.4%
TQQQ
12.3%

Healthcare

MIDU
2.4%
TQQQ
4.2%

Real Estate

MIDU
1.8%
TQQQ
0.1%

Basic Materials

MIDU
1.6%
TQQQ
1.1%

Energy

MIDU
1.2%
TQQQ
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

MIDU
0.8%
TQQQ
7.7%

Utilities

MIDU
0.7%
TQQQ
1.4%

Communication Services

MIDU
0.4%
TQQQ
15.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIDU vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MIDU
MIDU Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
MIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MIDU vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIDUTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.17

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

1.29

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.19

3.60

+2.59

MIDU vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDU Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDU and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIDU vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDU drawdown since its inception was -86.26%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDU and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIDUTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.26%

-81.66%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.80%

-36.97%

+11.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.41%

-58.04%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.14%

-81.66%

+17.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.26%

-81.66%

-4.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.20%

-25.74%

+17.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.27%

-18.49%

-3.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.83%

13.24%

-5.41%

Volatility

MIDU vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) is 10.19%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 20.41%. This indicates that MIDU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIDUTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.19%

20.41%

-10.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.51%

47.79%

-13.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.01%

57.62%

-10.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.21%

68.04%

-8.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.46%

66.57%

-3.11%

MIDU vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIDU vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

MIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than TQQQ's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIDU
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.52%1.04%1.10%1.43%0.11%0.00%0.06%0.71%0.70%2.67%1.89%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.58%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIDU and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (20.41%) compared to MIDU (10.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDU dropped -86.26% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 39.46% vs 11.16% for MIDU. On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MIDU has been the lower-risk option at 10.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 39.46% return vs 11.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MIDU.

TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.52% for MIDU.

MIDU tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MIDU and 0.95% for TQQQ.

MIDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIDU and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer