QINT vs. ACGR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

QINT (American Century Quality Diversified International ETF) and ACGR (American Century Large Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QINT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index, while ACGR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QINT returned 9.17%/yr vs 15.34%/yr for ACGR. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.39% expense ratio.

Performance

QINT vs. ACGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QINT achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly higher than ACGR's 8.73% return.

QINT

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 2.51%
• YTD: 10.27%
• 6M: 13.81%
• 1Y: 25.71%
• 3Y*: 20.98%
• 5Y*: 9.17%
• 10Y*: —

ACGR

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 7.07%
• YTD: 8.73%
• 6M: 8.10%
• 1Y: 26.66%
• 3Y*: 21.94%
• 5Y*: 15.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QINT vs. ACGR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF	10.27%	38.12%	6.53%	20.36%	-19.75%	9.29%	15.67%
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF	8.73%	14.50%	26.66%	43.24%	-30.13%	39.24%	11.27%

Correlation

The correlation between QINT and ACGR is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2020	0.58

The correlation between QINT and ACGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QINT vs. ACGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QINT

QINT Risk / Return Rank: 50
QINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
QINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
QINT Omega Ratio Rank: 50
QINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
QINT Martin Ratio Rank: 55

ACGR

ACGR Risk / Return Rank: 43
ACGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
ACGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ACGR Omega Ratio Rank: 46
ACGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
ACGR Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QINT vs. ACGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QINT	ACGR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.74	+0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	2.37	+0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.30	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.37	1.71	+0.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.60	5.83	+3.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QINT vs. ACGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the ACGR Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QINT and ACGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QINT	ACGR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74	1.74	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.72	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.71	-0.13

Drawdowns

QINT vs. ACGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QINT drawdown since its inception was -33.86%, roughly equal to the maximum ACGR drawdown of -34.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QINT and ACGR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QINT	ACGR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.86%	-34.54%	+0.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.41%	-15.84%	+4.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.56%	-24.58%	+11.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.86%	-34.54%	+0.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	-0.45%	+0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.55%	-8.50%	+0.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	4.66%	-1.84%

Volatility

QINT vs. ACGR - Volatility Comparison

American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) at 3.35%. This indicates that QINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QINT	ACGR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.99%	3.35%	+1.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.33%	11.88%	+0.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.85%	15.43%	-0.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.22%	21.50%	-5.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.06%	21.42%	-3.36%

QINT vs. ACGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QINT and ACGR have an expense ratio of 0.39%.

Dividends

QINT vs. ACGR - Dividend Comparison

QINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than ACGR's 0.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF	0.09%	0.11%	0.23%	0.37%	0.48%	0.58%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF	2.48%	2.66%	3.49%	3.12%	3.56%	2.30%	1.61%	1.83%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QINT and ACGR in my portfolio?

QINT and ACGR have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QINT or ACGR?

QINT has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to ACGR (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QINT dropped -33.86% vs ACGR's -34.54%.

Which ETF is better, QINT or ACGR?

On 5-year performance, ACGR leads with 15.34% vs 9.17% for QINT. Both ETFs have the same 0.39% expense ratio. On volatility, ACGR has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QINT or ACGR?

Over the 5-year period, ACGR has performed better with a 15.34% return vs 9.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QINT or ACGR?

QINT and ACGR have the same expense ratio: 0.39% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QINT or ACGR?

QINT has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 0.09% for ACGR.

What is the main difference between QINT and ACGR?

QINT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ACGR is Large Cap Growth Equities. QINT tracks Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index, while ACGR tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.