PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QINT vs. BBIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QINT vs. BBIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QINT achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly higher than BBIN's 9.35% return.


QINT

1D
0.33%
1M
2.51%
YTD
10.27%
6M
13.81%
1Y
25.71%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*

BBIN

1D
0.57%
1M
2.54%
YTD
9.35%
6M
12.30%
1Y
21.43%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QINT vs. BBIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QINT
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
10.27%38.12%6.53%20.36%-19.75%9.29%17.95%2.53%
BBIN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF
9.35%31.86%3.65%18.54%-14.29%11.74%7.91%3.14%

Correlation

The correlation between QINT and BBIN is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2019

0.96

The correlation between QINT and BBIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

QINT vs. BBIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QINT
BBIN

Financial Services

19.8%
24.8%

Industrials

19.0%
16.6%

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%
5.4%

Healthcare

10.2%
9.0%

Basic Materials

9.4%
5.0%

Technology

8.9%
12.5%

Energy

6.4%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
5.9%

Communication Services

4.4%
3.2%

Utilities

1.6%
1.7%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.3%

Financial Services

QINT
19.8%
BBIN
24.8%

Industrials

QINT
19.0%
BBIN
16.6%

Consumer Cyclical

QINT
13.6%
BBIN
5.4%

Healthcare

QINT
10.2%
BBIN
9.0%

Basic Materials

QINT
9.4%
BBIN
5.0%

Technology

QINT
8.9%
BBIN
12.5%

Energy

QINT
6.4%
BBIN
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

QINT
5.8%
BBIN
5.9%

Communication Services

QINT
4.4%
BBIN
3.2%

Utilities

QINT
1.6%
BBIN
1.7%

Real Estate

QINT
1.0%
BBIN
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QINT vs. BBIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QINT
QINT Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
QINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
QINT Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
QINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QINT Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

BBIN
BBIN Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
BBIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBIN Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BBIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBIN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QINT vs. BBIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QINTBBINDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.74

1.38

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.47

2.01

+0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.25

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

1.98

+0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.60

7.38

+2.22

QINT vs. BBIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the BBIN Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QINT and BBIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QINTBBINDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

1.38

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.54

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.54

+0.04

Drawdowns

QINT vs. BBIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QINT drawdown since its inception was -33.86%, roughly equal to the maximum BBIN drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QINT and BBIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QINTBBINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.86%

-33.37%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.41%

-11.57%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.56%

-13.98%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.86%

-29.24%

-4.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-1.14%

+0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.55%

-6.31%

-1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

3.11%

-0.29%

Volatility

QINT vs. BBIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) is 4.99%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that QINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QINTBBINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.99%

5.31%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.33%

12.77%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.85%

15.59%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

16.57%

-0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.06%

19.13%

-1.07%

QINT vs. BBIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

QINT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BBIN's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

QINT vs. BBIN - Dividend Comparison

QINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than BBIN's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBIN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF
3.61%3.87%3.41%3.20%2.83%3.54%1.07%0.09%0.00%
QINT
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
2.48%2.66%3.49%3.12%3.56%2.30%1.61%1.83%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, QINT and BBIN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBIN has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to QINT (4.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QINT dropped -33.86% vs BBIN's -33.37%.

On 5-year performance, QINT leads with 9.17% vs 8.84% for BBIN. On fees, BBIN is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, QINT has been the lower-risk option at 4.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QINT has performed better with a 9.17% return vs 8.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBIN is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for QINT.

BBIN has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 2.48% for QINT.

QINT tracks Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index, while BBIN tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QINT and 0.07% for BBIN.

QINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QINT and BBIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer