QINT vs. IQLT
QINT (American Century Quality Diversified International ETF) and IQLT (iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - QINT tracks the Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index while IQLT tracks the MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QINT returned 9.53%/yr vs 7.82%/yr for IQLT. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QINT charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IQLT.
Performance
QINT vs. IQLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QINT having a 10.63% return and IQLT slightly lower at 10.21%.
QINT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 10.63%
- 6M
- 10.70%
- 1Y
- 28.44%
- 3Y*
- 21.12%
- 5Y*
- 9.53%
- 10Y*
- —
IQLT
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- YTD
- 10.21%
- 6M
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- 20.82%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 7.82%
- 10Y*
- 10.24%
QINT vs. IQLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 10.63% | 38.12% | 6.53% | 20.36% | -19.75% | 9.29% | 17.95% | 23.46% | -14.13% |
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 10.21% | 25.42% | 1.54% | 18.73% | -15.22% | 12.94% | 12.48% | 28.18% | -9.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between QINT and IQLT is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018 | 0.95 |
The correlation between QINT and IQLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
QINT vs. IQLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QINT
IQLT
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
QINT
IQLT
Industrials
QINT
IQLT
Consumer Cyclical
QINT
IQLT
Technology
QINT
IQLT
Healthcare
QINT
IQLT
Basic Materials
QINT
IQLT
Energy
QINT
IQLT
Consumer Defensive
QINT
IQLT
Communication Services
QINT
IQLT
Utilities
QINT
IQLT
Real Estate
QINT
IQLT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QINT vs. IQLT — Risk / Return Rank
QINT
IQLT
QINT vs. IQLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QINT | IQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.25 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 2.01 | +0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.09 | 7.67 | +2.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QINT vs. IQLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QINT drawdown since its inception was -33.86%, which is greater than IQLT's maximum drawdown of -32.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QINT and IQLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QINT | IQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.86% | -32.21% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.41% | -10.38% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.56% | -13.18% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.86% | -30.24% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -0.16% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.50% | -6.20% | -1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.72% | +0.11% |
Volatility
QINT vs. IQLT - Volatility Comparison
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) have volatilities of 4.90% and 4.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QINT | IQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 4.82% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.95% | 12.64% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.32% | 14.90% | +0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 16.53% | -0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 16.94% | +1.13% |
QINT vs. IQLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QINT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IQLT's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
QINT vs. IQLT - Dividend Comparison
QINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than IQLT's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 2.42% | 2.33% | 2.87% | 2.27% | 3.14% | 2.24% | 1.61% | 2.28% | 2.72% | 2.36% | 2.91% | 2.78% |
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 3.74% | 2.66% | 3.49% | 3.12% | 3.56% | 2.30% | 1.61% | 1.83% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, QINT and IQLT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QINT has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to IQLT (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QINT dropped -33.86% vs IQLT's -32.21%.
On 5-year performance, QINT leads with 9.53% vs 7.82% for IQLT. On fees, IQLT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QINT has performed better with a 9.53% return vs 7.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IQLT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for QINT.
QINT has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 2.42% for IQLT.
QINT tracks Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index, while IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: American Century and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QINT and 0.30% for IQLT.
QINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QINT and IQLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer