PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QINT vs. IQLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QINT vs. IQLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QINT having a 10.63% return and IQLT slightly lower at 10.21%.


QINT

1D
0.00%
1M
1.73%
YTD
10.63%
6M
10.70%
1Y
28.44%
3Y*
21.12%
5Y*
9.53%
10Y*

IQLT

1D
0.02%
1M
1.46%
YTD
10.21%
6M
10.35%
1Y
20.82%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
7.82%
10Y*
10.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QINT vs. IQLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QINT
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
10.63%38.12%6.53%20.36%-19.75%9.29%17.95%23.46%-14.13%
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
10.21%25.42%1.54%18.73%-15.22%12.94%12.48%28.18%-9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between QINT and IQLT is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018

0.95

The correlation between QINT and IQLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

QINT vs. IQLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QINT
IQLT

Financial Services

19.7%
25.0%

Industrials

18.9%
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%
8.3%

Technology

10.0%
13.0%

Healthcare

9.9%
8.7%

Basic Materials

9.7%
7.2%

Energy

5.8%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
6.4%

Communication Services

4.5%
3.1%

Utilities

1.5%
3.5%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.5%

Financial Services

QINT
19.7%
IQLT
25.0%

Industrials

QINT
18.9%
IQLT
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

QINT
13.6%
IQLT
8.3%

Technology

QINT
10.0%
IQLT
13.0%

Healthcare

QINT
9.9%
IQLT
8.7%

Basic Materials

QINT
9.7%
IQLT
7.2%

Energy

QINT
5.8%
IQLT
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

QINT
5.6%
IQLT
6.4%

Communication Services

QINT
4.5%
IQLT
3.1%

Utilities

QINT
1.5%
IQLT
3.5%

Real Estate

QINT
0.9%
IQLT
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QINT vs. IQLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QINT
QINT Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
QINT Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QINT Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

IQLT
IQLT Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
IQLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQLT Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IQLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQLT Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QINT vs. IQLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QINTIQLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.25

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

2.01

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.09

7.67

+2.42

QINT vs. IQLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the IQLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QINT and IQLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QINT vs. IQLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QINT drawdown since its inception was -33.86%, which is greater than IQLT's maximum drawdown of -32.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QINT and IQLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QINTIQLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.86%

-32.21%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.41%

-10.38%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.56%

-13.18%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.86%

-30.24%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-0.16%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.50%

-6.20%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

2.72%

+0.11%

Volatility

QINT vs. IQLT - Volatility Comparison

American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) have volatilities of 4.90% and 4.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QINTIQLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

4.82%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.95%

12.64%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.32%

14.90%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

16.53%

-0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.07%

16.94%

+1.13%

QINT vs. IQLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QINT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IQLT's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

QINT vs. IQLT - Dividend Comparison

QINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than IQLT's 2.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
2.42%2.33%2.87%2.27%3.14%2.24%1.61%2.28%2.72%2.36%2.91%2.78%
QINT
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
3.74%2.66%3.49%3.12%3.56%2.30%1.61%1.83%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, QINT and IQLT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QINT has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to IQLT (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QINT dropped -33.86% vs IQLT's -32.21%.

On 5-year performance, QINT leads with 9.53% vs 7.82% for IQLT. On fees, IQLT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QINT has performed better with a 9.53% return vs 7.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQLT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for QINT.

QINT has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 2.42% for IQLT.

QINT tracks Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index, while IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: American Century and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QINT and 0.30% for IQLT.

QINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QINT and IQLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer