ACGR vs. QARP
ACGR (American Century Large Cap Growth ETF) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACGR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index, while QARP is a Quality Factor fund tracking the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACGR returned 10.63%/yr vs 11.83%/yr for QARP. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ACGR charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.
Performance
ACGR vs. QARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACGR achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 13.09% return.
ACGR
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 2.62%
- 1Y
- 11.79%
- 3Y*
- 16.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.63%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.68%
QARP
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- YTD
- 13.09%
- 1Y
- 25.79%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.83%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $29.10K | $15.91K | $23.50K | |
| $110.48K | $118.49K | $177.11K |
ACGR vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF | 2.62% | 14.50% | 26.66% | 43.24% | -30.13% | 39.24% | 11.27% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 13.09% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 11.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACGR and QARP is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020 | 0.71 |
The correlation between ACGR and QARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACGR vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank
ACGR
QARP
ACGR vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACGR | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.41 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 3.37 | -2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.92 | 15.08 | -13.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACGR vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACGR drawdown since its inception was -34.54%, roughly equal to the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACGR and QARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACGR | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.54% | -35.44% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.84% | -7.26% | -8.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.58% | -15.65% | -8.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.54% | -22.75% | -11.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.04% | -0.14% | -5.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.43% | -4.37% | -4.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.24% | 1.62% | +3.62% |
Volatility
ACGR vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.59%. This indicates that ACGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACGR | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 2.59% | +3.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.60% | 8.16% | +5.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.13% | 10.71% | +6.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.55% | 15.52% | +6.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 19.51% | +1.90% |
ACGR vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACGR has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACGR vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison
ACGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than QARP's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.12% | 0.11% | 0.23% | 0.37% | 0.48% | 0.58% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACGR and QARP have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACGR has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to QARP (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACGR dropped -34.54% vs QARP's -35.44%.
On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 11.83% vs 10.63% for ACGR. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 11.83% return vs 10.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ACGR.
QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.12% for ACGR.
ACGR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QARP is Quality Factor. ACGR tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ACGR and 0.19% for QARP.
QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACGR and QARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer