ACGR vs. PGRO
Compare and contrast key facts about American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) and Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO).
ACGR and PGRO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ACGR is a passively managed fund by American Century that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 29, 2021. PGRO is an actively managed fund by Power Corporation of Canada. It was launched on May 25, 2021.
Performance
ACGR vs. PGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ACGR vs. PGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF | -9.16% | 14.50% | 26.66% | 43.24% | -30.13% | 29.88% |
PGRO Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF | -8.64% | 15.13% | 34.01% | 45.19% | -31.53% | 16.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACGR achieves a -9.16% return, which is significantly lower than PGRO's -8.64% return.
ACGR
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.64%
- YTD
- -9.16%
- 6M
- -8.61%
- 1Y
- 17.03%
- 3Y*
- 17.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- —
PGRO
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -8.64%
- 6M
- -8.74%
- 1Y
- 16.68%
- 3Y*
- 21.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ACGR vs. PGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACGR has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PGRO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ACGR vs. PGRO — Risk / Return Rank
ACGR
PGRO
ACGR vs. PGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) and Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACGR | PGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 0.73 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 1.23 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.17 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 1.09 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.84 | 3.64 | +0.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACGR | PGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.73 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.49 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between ACGR and PGRO is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ACGR vs. PGRO - Dividend Comparison
ACGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, more than PGRO's 0.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.11% | 0.11% | 0.23% | 0.37% | 0.48% | 0.58% | 1.44% |
PGRO Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.08% | 0.19% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ACGR vs. PGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACGR drawdown since its inception was -34.54%, roughly equal to the maximum PGRO drawdown of -34.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACGR and PGRO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACGR | PGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.54% | -34.73% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.84% | -16.34% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.00% | -12.23% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.66% | -10.54% | +1.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.65% | 4.91% | -0.26% |
Volatility
ACGR vs. PGRO - Volatility Comparison
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) and Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) have volatilities of 6.69% and 7.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ACGR | PGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.69% | 7.04% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.55% | 12.77% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.21% | 22.92% | -0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.46% | 21.93% | -0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 21.93% | -0.36% |