QINT vs. STLG
Compare and contrast key facts about American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG).
QINT and STLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QINT is a passively managed fund by American Century that tracks the performance of the Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index. It was launched on Sep 10, 2018. STLG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell US Large Cap Factors Growth Style Index. It was launched on Jan 14, 2020. Both QINT and STLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QINT vs. STLG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QINT vs. STLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 1.99% | 38.12% | 6.53% | 20.36% | -19.75% | 9.29% | 15.28% |
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF | -6.01% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QINT achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly higher than STLG's -6.01% return.
QINT
- 1D
- 3.43%
- 1M
- -7.11%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 8.10%
- 1Y
- 30.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.16%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- —
STLG
- 1D
- 3.86%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- -6.01%
- 6M
- -2.39%
- 1Y
- 25.79%
- 3Y*
- 25.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.18%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QINT vs. STLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QINT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than STLG's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QINT vs. STLG — Risk / Return Rank
QINT
STLG
QINT vs. STLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QINT | STLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | 1.06 | +0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.40 | 1.62 | +0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.23 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 1.87 | +0.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.20 | 6.91 | +3.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QINT | STLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 1.06 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.70 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.71 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between QINT and STLG is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QINT vs. STLG - Dividend Comparison
QINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than STLG's 0.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 2.68% | 2.66% | 3.49% | 3.12% | 3.56% | 2.30% | 1.61% | 1.83% | 0.42% |
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF | 0.32% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QINT vs. STLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QINT drawdown since its inception was -33.86%, which is greater than STLG's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QINT and STLG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QINT | STLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.86% | -31.34% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.41% | -13.69% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.86% | -30.61% | -3.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.43% | -10.35% | +2.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -7.53% | -0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 3.71% | -0.86% |
Volatility
QINT vs. STLG - Volatility Comparison
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) have volatilities of 7.68% and 7.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QINT | STLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.68% | 7.52% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.10% | 14.44% | -3.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.24% | 24.39% | -7.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 21.86% | -5.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.06% | 24.02% | -5.96% |