QIBGX vs. PALDX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QIBGX (Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund) and PALDX (PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, QIBGX returned 10.52%/yr vs 9.32%/yr for PALDX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QIBGX charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for PALDX.

Performance

QIBGX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QIBGX achieves a 5.27% return, which is significantly lower than PALDX's 7.39% return.

QIBGX

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 1.51%
• YTD: 5.27%
• 6M: 6.42%
• 1Y: 15.61%
• 3Y*: 19.02%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: 11.23%

PALDX

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 2.30%
• YTD: 7.39%
• 6M: 7.89%
• 1Y: 20.18%
• 3Y*: 16.92%
• 5Y*: 9.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QIBGX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QIBGX Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund	5.27%	14.68%	28.30%	14.26%	-13.54%	17.43%	16.17%	19.00%	-2.96%	5.31%
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	7.39%	13.62%	18.96%	18.90%	-15.65%	16.30%	10.68%	22.27%	-4.12%	5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between QIBGX and PALDX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017	0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between QIBGX and PALDX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

QIBGX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QIBGX

QIBGX Risk / Return Rank: 24
QIBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
QIBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
QIBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
QIBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
QIBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

PALDX

PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 78
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QIBGX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QIBGX	PALDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	2.59	-1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	3.72	-1.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.49	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.46	3.43	-1.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.81	16.27	-12.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QIBGX vs. PALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QIBGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the PALDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QIBGX and PALDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QIBGX	PALDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	2.59	-1.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.77	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.80	-0.17

Drawdowns

QIBGX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QIBGX drawdown since its inception was -42.95%, which is greater than PALDX's maximum drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIBGX and PALDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QIBGX	PALDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.95%	-26.16%	-16.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.09%	-5.96%	-5.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.25%	-16.06%	-2.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.32%	-20.47%	+1.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.67%	-0.46%	-1.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.59%	-4.09%	-1.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.23%	1.25%	+2.98%

Volatility

QIBGX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) have volatilities of 2.27% and 2.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QIBGX	PALDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.27%	2.31%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.78%	6.18%	+6.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.68%	7.91%	+5.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.52%	12.11%	+3.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.21%	12.69%	+1.52%

QIBGX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QIBGX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

QIBGX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison

QIBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.41%, more than PALDX's 5.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	5.05%	5.42%	10.40%	2.94%	6.19%	6.87%	2.58%	4.58%	3.65%	1.48%	0.00%	0.00%
QIBGX Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund	8.41%	8.86%	20.13%	1.82%	6.92%	9.99%	4.36%	4.33%	10.60%	1.59%	1.86%	1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QIBGX and PALDX in my portfolio?

QIBGX and PALDX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QIBGX or PALDX?

PALDX has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to QIBGX (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QIBGX dropped -42.95% vs PALDX's -26.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.