QIBGX vs. TRAIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund - I Class (TRAIX).
QIBGX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Sep 30, 2002. TRAIX is an actively managed fund by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 17, 2015.
Performance
QIBGX vs. TRAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QIBGX vs. TRAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QIBGX Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund | -4.82% | 14.68% | 28.30% | 14.26% | -13.54% | 17.43% | 16.17% | 19.00% | -2.96% | 14.12% |
TRAIX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund - I Class | -4.98% | 21.05% | 12.64% | 19.01% | -11.89% | 18.59% | 18.28% | 24.71% | 0.76% | 15.45% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QIBGX having a -4.82% return and TRAIX slightly lower at -4.98%. Over the past 10 years, QIBGX has underperformed TRAIX with an annualized return of 10.22%, while TRAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.32% annualized return.
QIBGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- -4.82%
- 6M
- -2.32%
- 1Y
- 9.56%
- 3Y*
- 15.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
TRAIX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -4.85%
- YTD
- -4.98%
- 6M
- 3.88%
- 1Y
- 15.02%
- 3Y*
- 13.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.13%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QIBGX vs. TRAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QIBGX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than TRAIX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QIBGX vs. TRAIX — Risk / Return Rank
QIBGX
TRAIX
QIBGX vs. TRAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund - I Class (TRAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QIBGX | TRAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.58 | 1.14 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.91 | 2.13 | -1.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.30 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 2.05 | -1.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.09 | 8.55 | -6.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QIBGX | TRAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | 1.14 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.69 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.88 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.88 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between QIBGX and TRAIX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QIBGX vs. TRAIX - Dividend Comparison
QIBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, less than TRAIX's 16.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QIBGX Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund | 9.31% | 8.86% | 20.13% | 1.82% | 6.92% | 9.99% | 4.36% | 4.33% | 10.60% | 1.59% | 1.86% | 1.75% |
TRAIX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund - I Class | 16.70% | 15.87% | 10.52% | 4.28% | 9.70% | 9.35% | 8.08% | 5.92% | 7.57% | 6.96% | 3.59% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QIBGX vs. TRAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QIBGX drawdown since its inception was -42.95%, which is greater than TRAIX's maximum drawdown of -26.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIBGX and TRAIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QIBGX | TRAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.95% | -26.84% | -16.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.09% | -6.77% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.32% | -17.00% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.97% | -26.84% | +0.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.09% | -6.24% | -4.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.60% | -2.86% | -2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 1.62% | +2.37% |
Volatility
QIBGX vs. TRAIX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund - I Class (TRAIX) at 2.97%. This indicates that QIBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QIBGX | TRAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 2.97% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.58% | 9.57% | +3.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.09% | 13.40% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 13.22% | +2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.17% | 12.97% | +1.20% |