PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PALDX vs. FHLKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PALDX vs. FHLKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) and Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K (FHLKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PALDX having a 7.39% return and FHLKX slightly lower at 7.13%.


PALDX

1D
0.60%
1M
0.94%
YTD
7.39%
6M
7.16%
1Y
20.27%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*

FHLKX

1D
0.68%
1M
1.17%
YTD
7.13%
6M
7.30%
1Y
14.90%
3Y*
10.22%
5Y*
4.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PALDX vs. FHLKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
7.39%13.62%18.96%18.90%-15.65%16.30%14.33%
FHLKX
Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K
7.13%12.17%7.06%9.82%-14.79%5.50%10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between PALDX and FHLKX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2020

0.85

The correlation between PALDX and FHLKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PALDX vs. FHLKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PALDX
PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLKX
FHLKX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FHLKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PALDX vs. FHLKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) and Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K (FHLKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PALDXFHLKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.48

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

3.36

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.74

14.39

+1.35

PALDX vs. FHLKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PALDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the FHLKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PALDX and FHLKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PALDX vs. FHLKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PALDX drawdown since its inception was -26.16%, which is greater than FHLKX's maximum drawdown of -19.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALDX and FHLKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PALDXFHLKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.16%

-19.09%

-7.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.96%

-4.42%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.06%

-6.64%

-9.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.47%

-19.09%

-1.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.12%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-4.79%

+0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

1.03%

+0.26%

Volatility

PALDX vs. FHLKX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K (FHLKX) at 2.65%. This indicates that PALDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PALDXFHLKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

2.65%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.78%

5.36%

+1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.34%

6.25%

+2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.17%

6.82%

+5.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.70%

7.31%

+5.39%

PALDX vs. FHLKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PALDX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FHLKX's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

PALDX vs. FHLKX - Dividend Comparison

PALDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than FHLKX's 2.88% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHLKX
Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K
2.88%3.05%3.01%2.88%3.85%2.84%1.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
5.05%5.42%10.40%2.94%6.19%6.87%2.58%4.58%3.65%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


PALDX and FHLKX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PALDX has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to FHLKX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PALDX dropped -26.16% vs FHLKX's -19.09%.

PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PALDX and FHLKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer