PALDX vs. FHLKX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) and Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K (FHLKX).

PALDX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017. FHLKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 2, 2020.

Performance

PALDX vs. FHLKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) and Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K (FHLKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PALDX vs. FHLKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	-3.62%	13.62%	18.96%	18.90%	-15.65%	16.30%	15.28%
FHLKX Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K	-0.73%	12.17%	7.06%	9.82%	-14.79%	5.50%	10.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PALDX achieves a -3.62% return, which is significantly lower than FHLKX's -0.73% return.

PALDX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -5.44%
• YTD: -3.62%
• 6M: -1.03%
• 1Y: 12.43%
• 3Y*: 13.72%
• 5Y*: 7.99%
• 10Y*: —

FHLKX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -4.25%
• YTD: -0.73%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: 10.18%
• 3Y*: 7.91%
• 5Y*: 3.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PALDX vs. FHLKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PALDX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FHLKX's 0.37% expense ratio.

FHLKX

Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K

PALDX

PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund

Return for Risk

PALDX vs. FHLKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PALDX

PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 66
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

FHLKX

FHLKX Risk / Return Rank: 82
FHLKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FHLKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FHLKX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FHLKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FHLKX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PALDX vs. FHLKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) and Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K (FHLKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PALDX	FHLKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	1.52	-0.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	2.12	-0.46
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.32	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	1.96	-0.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.83	8.66	-1.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PALDX vs. FHLKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PALDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the FHLKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PALDX and FHLKX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PALDX	FHLKX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.12	1.52	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.53	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.62	+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between PALDX and FHLKX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PALDX vs. FHLKX - Dividend Comparison

PALDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, more than FHLKX's 3.09% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	5.62%	5.42%	10.40%	2.94%	6.19%	6.87%	2.58%	4.58%	3.65%	1.48%
FHLKX Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K	3.09%	3.05%	3.01%	2.88%	3.85%	2.84%	1.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PALDX vs. FHLKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PALDX drawdown since its inception was -26.16%, which is greater than FHLKX's maximum drawdown of -19.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALDX and FHLKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PALDX	FHLKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.16%	-19.09%	-7.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.20%	-4.97%	-3.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.47%	-19.09%	-1.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.96%	-4.34%	-1.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.16%	-4.94%	+0.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.70%	1.13%	+0.57%

Volatility

PALDX vs. FHLKX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K (FHLKX) at 2.76%. This indicates that PALDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PALDX	FHLKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.05%	2.76%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.86%	4.38%	+1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.52%	6.76%	+4.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.08%	6.65%	+5.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.75%	7.26%	+5.49%