PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PALDX vs. MAPOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PALDX vs. MAPOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) and Mairs & Power Balanced Fund (MAPOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PALDX achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly higher than MAPOX's 6.14% return.


PALDX

1D
1.22%
1M
-0.33%
6M
4.97%
YTD
6.54%
1Y
15.23%
3Y*
14.79%
5Y*
8.53%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.89%

MAPOX

1D
0.36%
1M
-0.54%
6M
3.55%
YTD
6.14%
1Y
10.77%
3Y*
8.69%
5Y*
3.84%
10Y*
7.17%
ALL TIME*
6.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PALDX vs. MAPOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
6.54%13.62%18.96%18.90%-15.65%16.30%10.68%22.27%-4.12%5.95%
MAPOX
Mairs & Power Balanced Fund
6.14%6.61%9.60%13.39%-14.99%14.97%10.49%20.33%-2.77%5.08%

Correlation

The correlation between PALDX and MAPOX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2017

0.86

The correlation between PALDX and MAPOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PALDX vs. MAPOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PALDX
PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

MAPOX
MAPOX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MAPOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAPOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAPOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MAPOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAPOX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PALDX vs. MAPOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) and Mairs & Power Balanced Fund (MAPOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PALDXMAPOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.22

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

1.47

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.80

5.71

+5.09

PALDX vs. MAPOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PALDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the MAPOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PALDX and MAPOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PALDX vs. MAPOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PALDX drawdown since its inception was -26.16%, smaller than the maximum MAPOX drawdown of -69.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALDX and MAPOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PALDXMAPOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.16%

-69.72%

+43.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.96%

-6.77%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.06%

-10.74%

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.47%

-21.48%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-0.64%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-21.12%

+17.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

1.74%

-0.40%

Volatility

PALDX vs. MAPOX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) has a higher volatility of 2.39% compared to Mairs & Power Balanced Fund (MAPOX) at 2.07%. This indicates that PALDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAPOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PALDXMAPOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.39%

2.07%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.95%

6.10%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.59%

8.00%

+0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.20%

10.46%

+1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.65%

11.13%

+1.52%

PALDX vs. MAPOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PALDX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than MAPOX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

PALDX vs. MAPOX - Dividend Comparison

PALDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, more than MAPOX's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAPOX
Mairs & Power Balanced Fund
2.84%2.90%2.01%3.64%6.96%3.48%4.37%4.58%5.30%3.80%2.96%4.23%
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
5.09%5.42%10.40%2.94%6.19%6.87%2.58%4.58%3.65%1.48%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PALDX and MAPOX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PALDX has higher volatility (2.39%) compared to MAPOX (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PALDX dropped -26.16% vs MAPOX's -69.72%.

PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PALDX and MAPOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer