PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QIBGX vs. FHYTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QIBGX vs. FHYTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) and Federated Hermes Opportunistic High Yield Bond Fund (FHYTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QIBGX achieves a 5.27% return, which is significantly higher than FHYTX's 1.34% return. Over the past 10 years, QIBGX has outperformed FHYTX with an annualized return of 11.23%, while FHYTX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.27% annualized return.


QIBGX

1D
-0.51%
1M
1.51%
YTD
5.27%
6M
6.42%
1Y
15.61%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
11.23%

FHYTX

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.74%
YTD
1.34%
6M
2.11%
1Y
6.86%
3Y*
8.29%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*
6.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QIBGX vs. FHYTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QIBGX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund
5.27%14.68%28.30%14.26%-13.54%17.43%16.17%19.00%-2.96%14.12%
FHYTX
Federated Hermes Opportunistic High Yield Bond Fund
1.34%8.40%6.24%13.22%-13.45%7.37%6.72%15.34%-4.66%7.46%

Correlation

The correlation between QIBGX and FHYTX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2003

0.55

The correlation between QIBGX and FHYTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QIBGX vs. FHYTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QIBGX
QIBGX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
QIBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
QIBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

FHYTX
FHYTX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FHYTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHYTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHYTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FHYTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHYTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QIBGX vs. FHYTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) and Federated Hermes Opportunistic High Yield Bond Fund (FHYTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QIBGXFHYTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.46

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

2.61

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.81

12.42

-8.61

QIBGX vs. FHYTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QIBGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the FHYTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QIBGX and FHYTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QIBGXFHYTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.98

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.55

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.86

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

1.08

-0.44

Drawdowns

QIBGX vs. FHYTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QIBGX drawdown since its inception was -42.95%, which is greater than FHYTX's maximum drawdown of -34.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIBGX and FHYTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QIBGXFHYTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.95%

-34.98%

-7.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.09%

-2.76%

-8.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.25%

-4.12%

-14.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.32%

-17.04%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.97%

-24.18%

-1.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-0.15%

-1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-4.52%

-1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

0.58%

+3.65%

Volatility

QIBGX vs. FHYTX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) has a higher volatility of 2.27% compared to Federated Hermes Opportunistic High Yield Bond Fund (FHYTX) at 1.17%. This indicates that QIBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHYTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QIBGXFHYTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.27%

1.17%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.78%

2.88%

+9.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.68%

3.65%

+10.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.52%

5.68%

+9.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.21%

7.28%

+6.93%

QIBGX vs. FHYTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QIBGX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FHYTX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

QIBGX vs. FHYTX - Dividend Comparison

QIBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.41%, more than FHYTX's 5.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHYTX
Federated Hermes Opportunistic High Yield Bond Fund
5.22%5.19%4.91%5.42%4.40%3.95%4.67%5.01%6.71%4.68%14.56%5.28%
QIBGX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund
8.41%8.86%20.13%1.82%6.92%9.99%4.36%4.33%10.60%1.59%1.86%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


QIBGX and FHYTX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QIBGX has higher volatility (2.27%) compared to FHYTX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QIBGX dropped -42.95% vs FHYTX's -34.98%.

FHYTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QIBGX and FHYTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer