QIBGX vs. FHYTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) and Federated Hermes Opportunistic High Yield Bond Fund (FHYTX).
QIBGX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Sep 30, 2002. FHYTX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Aug 23, 1984.
Performance
QIBGX vs. FHYTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QIBGX vs. FHYTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QIBGX Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund | -4.82% | 14.68% | 28.30% | 14.26% | -13.54% | 17.43% | 16.17% | 19.00% | -2.96% | 14.12% |
FHYTX Federated Hermes Opportunistic High Yield Bond Fund | -2.24% | 8.40% | 6.24% | 13.22% | -13.45% | 7.37% | 6.72% | 15.34% | -4.66% | 7.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QIBGX achieves a -4.82% return, which is significantly lower than FHYTX's -2.24% return. Over the past 10 years, QIBGX has outperformed FHYTX with an annualized return of 10.22%, while FHYTX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.32% annualized return.
QIBGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- -4.82%
- 6M
- -2.32%
- 1Y
- 9.56%
- 3Y*
- 15.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
FHYTX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- -2.24%
- 6M
- -0.78%
- 1Y
- 5.48%
- 3Y*
- 7.17%
- 5Y*
- 2.93%
- 10Y*
- 6.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QIBGX vs. FHYTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QIBGX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FHYTX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QIBGX vs. FHYTX — Risk / Return Rank
QIBGX
FHYTX
QIBGX vs. FHYTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) and Federated Hermes Opportunistic High Yield Bond Fund (FHYTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QIBGX | FHYTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.58 | 1.31 | -0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.91 | 1.79 | -0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.33 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 1.66 | -0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.09 | 7.17 | -5.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QIBGX | FHYTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | 1.31 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.52 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.87 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 1.06 | -0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between QIBGX and FHYTX is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QIBGX vs. FHYTX - Dividend Comparison
QIBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, more than FHYTX's 4.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QIBGX Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund | 9.31% | 8.86% | 20.13% | 1.82% | 6.92% | 9.99% | 4.36% | 4.33% | 10.60% | 1.59% | 1.86% | 1.75% |
FHYTX Federated Hermes Opportunistic High Yield Bond Fund | 4.96% | 5.19% | 4.91% | 5.42% | 4.40% | 3.95% | 4.67% | 5.01% | 6.71% | 4.68% | 14.56% | 5.28% |
Drawdowns
QIBGX vs. FHYTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QIBGX drawdown since its inception was -42.95%, which is greater than FHYTX's maximum drawdown of -34.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIBGX and FHYTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QIBGX | FHYTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.95% | -34.98% | -7.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.09% | -3.17% | -7.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.32% | -17.04% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.97% | -24.18% | -1.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.09% | -2.76% | -8.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.60% | -4.54% | -1.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 0.73% | +3.26% |
Volatility
QIBGX vs. FHYTX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Federated Hermes Opportunistic High Yield Bond Fund (FHYTX) at 1.44%. This indicates that QIBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHYTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QIBGX | FHYTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 1.44% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.58% | 2.59% | +9.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.09% | 4.30% | +10.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 5.64% | +9.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.17% | 7.27% | +6.90% |