PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PALDX vs. VBIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PALDX vs. VBIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) and Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PALDX achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly higher than VBIAX's 6.69% return.


PALDX

1D
0.60%
1M
0.94%
YTD
7.39%
6M
7.16%
1Y
20.27%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*

VBIAX

1D
0.79%
1M
0.89%
YTD
6.69%
6M
6.29%
1Y
18.22%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
7.84%
10Y*
9.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PALDX vs. VBIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
7.39%13.62%18.96%18.90%-15.65%16.30%10.68%22.27%-4.12%5.95%
VBIAX
Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Admiral Shares
6.69%13.61%14.58%17.54%-16.90%14.21%16.40%21.78%-2.86%4.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PALDX and VBIAX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2017

0.96

The correlation between PALDX and VBIAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PALDX vs. VBIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PALDX
PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

VBIAX
VBIAX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VBIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VBIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PALDX vs. VBIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) and Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PALDXVBIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.40

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

3.12

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.74

13.84

+1.90

PALDX vs. VBIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PALDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the VBIAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PALDX and VBIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PALDX vs. VBIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PALDX drawdown since its inception was -26.16%, smaller than the maximum VBIAX drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALDX and VBIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PALDXVBIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.16%

-35.90%

+9.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.96%

-5.83%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.06%

-11.70%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.47%

-21.53%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.62%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-4.44%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

1.31%

-0.02%

Volatility

PALDX vs. VBIAX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) and Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBIAX) have volatilities of 3.29% and 3.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PALDXVBIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

3.33%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.78%

6.72%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.34%

8.36%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.17%

11.12%

+1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.70%

11.25%

+1.45%

PALDX vs. VBIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PALDX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VBIAX's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PALDX vs. VBIAX - Dividend Comparison

PALDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, less than VBIAX's 5.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
5.05%5.42%10.40%2.94%6.19%6.87%2.58%4.58%3.65%1.48%0.00%0.00%
VBIAX
Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Admiral Shares
5.25%6.00%5.27%4.35%2.83%3.19%2.65%2.28%2.32%1.95%2.09%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, PALDX and VBIAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VBIAX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to PALDX (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PALDX dropped -26.16% vs VBIAX's -35.90%.

PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PALDX and VBIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer