QIBGX vs. BEARX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

QIBGX (Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund) and BEARX (Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd) are both mutual funds - QIBGX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Federated, while BEARX is a Inverse Equities fund managed by Federated. Over the past 10 years, QIBGX returned 11.28%/yr vs -14.57%/yr for BEARX. At a correlation of -0.86, they often move in opposite directions. QIBGX charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for BEARX.

Performance

QIBGX vs. BEARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) and Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QIBGX achieves a 3.79% return, which is significantly higher than BEARX's -6.07% return. Over the past 10 years, QIBGX has outperformed BEARX with an annualized return of 11.28%, while BEARX has yielded a comparatively lower -14.57% annualized return.

QIBGX

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -0.56%
• YTD: 3.79%
• 6M: 3.42%
• 1Y: 13.38%
• 3Y*: 18.23%
• 5Y*: 10.06%
• 10Y*: 11.28%

BEARX

• 1D: 1.71%
• 1M: 2.01%
• YTD: -6.07%
• 6M: -5.46%
• 1Y: -15.54%
• 3Y*: -15.31%
• 5Y*: -11.52%
• 10Y*: -14.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QIBGX vs. BEARX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QIBGX Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund	3.79%	14.68%	28.30%	14.26%	-13.54%	17.43%	16.17%	19.00%	-2.96%	14.12%
BEARX Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd	-6.07%	-12.42%	-20.34%	-18.67%	17.78%	-23.78%	-22.95%	-19.95%	-5.96%	-15.76%

Correlation

The correlation between QIBGX and BEARX is -0.86, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2003	-0.86

The correlation between QIBGX and BEARX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.92 to -0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QIBGX vs. BEARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QIBGX

QIBGX Risk / Return Rank: 21
QIBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
QIBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
QIBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
QIBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
QIBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

BEARX

BEARX Risk / Return Rank: 0
BEARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BEARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BEARX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BEARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
BEARX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QIBGX vs. BEARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) and Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QIBGX	BEARX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	-1.26	+2.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	-1.83	+3.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	0.78	+0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	-0.84	+2.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.14	-1.53	+4.67

QIBGX vs. BEARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QIBGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the BEARX Sharpe Ratio of -1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QIBGX and BEARX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QIBGX vs. BEARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QIBGX drawdown since its inception was -42.95%, smaller than the maximum BEARX drawdown of -95.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIBGX and BEARX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QIBGX	BEARX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.95%	-95.75%	+52.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.09%	-17.90%	+6.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.25%	-44.46%	+26.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.32%	-52.48%	+33.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.97%	-80.48%	+54.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.05%	-95.59%	+92.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.58%	-61.10%	+55.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.27%	10.17%	-5.90%

Volatility

QIBGX vs. BEARX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) is 3.33%, while Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX) has a volatility of 5.54%. This indicates that QIBGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QIBGX	BEARX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	5.54%	-2.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.30%	10.11%	-2.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.00%	12.39%	+1.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.57%	17.11%	-1.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.22%	16.72%	-2.50%

QIBGX vs. BEARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QIBGX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than BEARX's 1.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

QIBGX vs. BEARX - Dividend Comparison

QIBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.53%, more than BEARX's 7.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BEARX Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd	7.15%	6.71%	0.00%	13.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QIBGX Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund	8.53%	8.86%	20.13%	1.82%	6.92%	9.99%	4.36%	4.33%	10.60%	1.59%	1.86%	1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QIBGX and BEARX in my portfolio?

QIBGX and BEARX have a correlation of -0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QIBGX or BEARX?

BEARX has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to QIBGX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QIBGX dropped -42.95% vs BEARX's -95.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QIBGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.