PALDX vs. SCD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) and LMP Capital and Income Fund Inc. (SCD).

PALDX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017. SCD is managed by LMP.

Performance

PALDX vs. SCD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) and LMP Capital and Income Fund Inc. (SCD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PALDX vs. SCD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	-3.62%	13.62%	18.96%	18.90%	-15.65%	16.30%	10.68%	22.27%	-4.12%	5.95%
SCD LMP Capital and Income Fund Inc.	3.21%	-3.80%	33.95%	28.09%	-10.04%	46.29%	-14.89%	59.16%	-15.56%	1.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PALDX achieves a -3.62% return, which is significantly lower than SCD's 3.21% return.

PALDX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -5.44%
• YTD: -3.62%
• 6M: -1.03%
• 1Y: 12.43%
• 3Y*: 13.72%
• 5Y*: 7.99%
• 10Y*: —

SCD

• 1D: 1.91%
• 1M: -5.51%
• YTD: 3.21%
• 6M: 0.87%
• 1Y: 5.03%
• 3Y*: 17.99%
• 5Y*: 14.88%
• 10Y*: 13.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PALDX vs. SCD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PALDX

PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund

Return for Risk

PALDX vs. SCD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PALDX

PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 66
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

SCD

SCD Risk / Return Rank: 11
SCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
SCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
SCD Omega Ratio Rank: 10
SCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
SCD Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PALDX vs. SCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) and LMP Capital and Income Fund Inc. (SCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PALDX	SCD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	0.26	+0.85
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	0.48	+1.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.07	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	0.38	+1.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.83	1.09	+5.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PALDX vs. SCD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PALDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the SCD Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PALDX and SCD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PALDX	SCD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.12	0.26	+0.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.75	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.45	+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between PALDX and SCD is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PALDX vs. SCD - Dividend Comparison

PALDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, less than SCD's 9.62% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	5.62%	5.42%	10.40%	2.94%	6.19%	6.87%	2.58%	4.58%	3.65%	1.48%	0.00%	0.00%
SCD LMP Capital and Income Fund Inc.	9.62%	9.55%	7.88%	8.56%	12.96%	10.26%	10.21%	7.98%	11.61%	8.89%	9.33%	9.05%

Drawdowns

PALDX vs. SCD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PALDX drawdown since its inception was -26.16%, smaller than the maximum SCD drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALDX and SCD.

Drawdown Indicators

	PALDX	SCD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.16%	-62.40%	+36.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.20%	-15.61%	+7.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.47%	-23.41%	+2.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-60.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.96%	-6.33%	+0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.16%	-10.10%	+5.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.70%	5.38%	-3.68%

Volatility

PALDX vs. SCD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) is 3.05%, while LMP Capital and Income Fund Inc. (SCD) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that PALDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PALDX	SCD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.05%	5.14%	-2.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.86%	9.49%	-3.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.52%	19.14%	-7.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.08%	19.87%	-7.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.75%	23.34%	-10.59%