QGRO vs. IMCV
QGRO (American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF) and IMCV (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR), while IMCV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QGRO returned 11.72%/yr vs 8.79%/yr for IMCV. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QGRO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IMCV.
Performance
QGRO vs. IMCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGRO achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than IMCV's 9.75% return.
QGRO
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- 20.35%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- —
IMCV
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 11.34%
- 1Y
- 22.85%
- 3Y*
- 16.05%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 10.39%
QGRO vs. IMCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.09% | 15.18% | 31.42% | 32.42% | -24.54% | 24.57% | 37.99% | 35.09% | -16.85% |
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 9.75% | 13.52% | 12.28% | 11.89% | -6.98% | 33.56% | -4.11% | 24.72% | -14.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between QGRO and IMCV is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018 | 0.64 |
The correlation between QGRO and IMCV shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QGRO vs. IMCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QGRO
IMCV
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
QGRO
IMCV
Industrials
QGRO
IMCV
Healthcare
QGRO
IMCV
Consumer Cyclical
QGRO
IMCV
Communication Services
QGRO
IMCV
Financial Services
QGRO
IMCV
Consumer Defensive
QGRO
IMCV
Energy
QGRO
IMCV
Utilities
QGRO
IMCV
Real Estate
QGRO
IMCV
Basic Materials
QGRO
IMCV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QGRO vs. IMCV — Risk / Return Rank
QGRO
IMCV
QGRO vs. IMCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QGRO | IMCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.35 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 3.32 | -2.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.78 | 12.40 | -10.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QGRO | IMCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 1.97 | -1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.53 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.47 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
QGRO vs. IMCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGRO drawdown since its inception was -32.56%, smaller than the maximum IMCV drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRO and IMCV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGRO | IMCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.56% | -64.74% | +32.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -6.90% | -6.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.82% | -18.63% | -5.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.86% | -19.87% | -11.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -1.07% | -1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -8.41% | +0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 1.85% | +2.19% |
Volatility
QGRO vs. IMCV - Volatility Comparison
American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) at 2.35%. This indicates that QGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QGRO | IMCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 2.35% | +1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.03% | 8.05% | +3.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.58% | 11.66% | +3.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.09% | 16.64% | +4.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 19.66% | +3.27% |
QGRO vs. IMCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGRO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCV's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
QGRO vs. IMCV - Dividend Comparison
QGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than IMCV's 1.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 1.94% | 2.23% | 2.36% | 2.30% | 2.36% | 1.86% | 2.61% | 2.45% | 2.61% | 1.87% | 2.09% | 2.29% |
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.20% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QGRO and IMCV have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QGRO has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to IMCV (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRO dropped -32.56% vs IMCV's -64.74%.
On 5-year performance, QGRO leads with 11.72% vs 8.79% for IMCV. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QGRO has performed better with a 11.72% return vs 8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for QGRO.
IMCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.20% for QGRO.
QGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IMCV is Mid Cap Value Equities. QGRO tracks iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR), while IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QGRO and 0.06% for IMCV.
IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QGRO and IMCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer