PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
QGRO vs. BIAWX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


QGROBIAWX
YTD Return6.69%6.87%
1Y Return27.29%30.75%
3Y Return (Ann)7.06%7.62%
5Y Return (Ann)15.04%15.38%
Sharpe Ratio2.052.06
Daily Std Dev13.94%15.64%
Max Drawdown-32.57%-36.94%
Current Drawdown-5.40%-4.14%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between QGRO and BIAWX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

QGRO vs. BIAWX - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QGRO having a 6.69% return and BIAWX slightly higher at 6.87%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


70.00%80.00%90.00%100.00%110.00%120.00%130.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
105.84%
119.27%
QGRO
BIAWX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF

Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund

QGRO vs. BIAWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QGRO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BIAWX's 0.78% expense ratio.


BIAWX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund
Expense ratio chart for BIAWX: current value at 0.78% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.78%
Expense ratio chart for QGRO: current value at 0.29% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.29%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QGRO vs. BIAWX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QGRO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QGRO, currently valued at 2.05, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.002.05
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for QGRO, currently valued at 2.89, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.002.89
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for QGRO, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.501.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for QGRO, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.39
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for QGRO, currently valued at 8.57, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.008.57
BIAWX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BIAWX, currently valued at 2.06, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.002.06
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BIAWX, currently valued at 2.89, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.002.89
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BIAWX, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.501.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BIAWX, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.27
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BIAWX, currently valued at 9.66, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.009.66

QGRO vs. BIAWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QGRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which roughly equals the BIAWX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of QGRO and BIAWX.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
2.05
2.06
QGRO
BIAWX

Dividends

QGRO vs. BIAWX - Dividend Comparison

QGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while BIAWX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
QGRO
American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF
0.34%0.41%0.46%0.31%0.22%0.38%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BIAWX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%1.85%0.00%0.75%3.75%1.71%0.72%4.76%2.10%1.03%

Drawdowns

QGRO vs. BIAWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QGRO drawdown since its inception was -32.57%, smaller than the maximum BIAWX drawdown of -36.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRO and BIAWX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-5.40%
-4.14%
QGRO
BIAWX

Volatility

QGRO vs. BIAWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) is 4.64%, while Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that QGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIAWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
4.64%
5.04%
QGRO
BIAWX