PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
QGRO vs. BIAWX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QGRO and BIAWX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.9

Performance

QGRO vs. BIAWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

80.00%100.00%120.00%140.00%160.00%180.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
132.10%
92.03%
QGRO
BIAWX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QGRO:

0.50

BIAWX:

-0.34

Sortino Ratio

QGRO:

0.83

BIAWX:

-0.33

Omega Ratio

QGRO:

1.12

BIAWX:

0.96

Calmar Ratio

QGRO:

0.48

BIAWX:

-0.30

Martin Ratio

QGRO:

1.89

BIAWX:

-1.08

Ulcer Index

QGRO:

5.99%

BIAWX:

7.68%

Daily Std Dev

QGRO:

22.82%

BIAWX:

24.30%

Max Drawdown

QGRO:

-32.57%

BIAWX:

-38.09%

Current Drawdown

QGRO:

-16.98%

BIAWX:

-20.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QGRO achieves a -8.46% return, which is significantly higher than BIAWX's -12.88% return.


QGRO

YTD

-8.46%

1M

-3.30%

6M

-2.49%

1Y

13.37%

5Y*

17.92%

10Y*

N/A

BIAWX

YTD

-12.88%

1M

-5.09%

6M

-15.89%

1Y

-6.84%

5Y*

11.71%

10Y*

11.84%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QGRO vs. BIAWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QGRO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BIAWX's 0.78% expense ratio.


BIAWX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund
Expense ratio chart for BIAWX: current value is 0.78%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
BIAWX: 0.78%
Expense ratio chart for QGRO: current value is 0.29%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
QGRO: 0.29%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QGRO vs. BIAWX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QGRO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QGRO is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QGRO is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QGRO is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QGRO is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QGRO is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QGRO is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

BIAWX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BIAWX is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BIAWX is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BIAWX is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BIAWX is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BIAWX is 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BIAWX is 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QGRO vs. BIAWX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QGRO, currently valued at 0.50, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
QGRO: 0.50
BIAWX: -0.34
The chart of Sortino ratio for QGRO, currently valued at 0.83, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00
QGRO: 0.83
BIAWX: -0.33
The chart of Omega ratio for QGRO, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
QGRO: 1.12
BIAWX: 0.96
The chart of Calmar ratio for QGRO, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
QGRO: 0.48
BIAWX: -0.30
The chart of Martin ratio for QGRO, currently valued at 1.89, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
QGRO: 1.89
BIAWX: -1.08

The current QGRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is higher than the BIAWX Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QGRO and BIAWX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.50
-0.34
QGRO
BIAWX

Dividends

QGRO vs. BIAWX - Dividend Comparison

QGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, while BIAWX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
QGRO
American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF
0.31%0.25%0.41%0.46%0.31%0.22%0.38%0.13%
BIAWX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QGRO vs. BIAWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QGRO drawdown since its inception was -32.57%, smaller than the maximum BIAWX drawdown of -38.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRO and BIAWX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-16.98%
-20.76%
QGRO
BIAWX

Volatility

QGRO vs. BIAWX - Volatility Comparison

American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) have volatilities of 15.09% and 15.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
15.09%
15.77%
QGRO
BIAWX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab