QFRD vs. LRNZ

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

QFRD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF) and LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. QFRD is passively managed, while LRNZ is actively managed. QFRD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for LRNZ.

Performance

QFRD vs. LRNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QFRD

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 3.98%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRNZ

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QFRD vs. LRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QFRD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF	-0.53%
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	-0.73%

Return for Risk

QFRD vs. LRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

QFRD vs. LRNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QFRD drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, which is greater than LRNZ's maximum drawdown of -0.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFRD and LRNZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	QFRD	LRNZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.69%	-0.73%	-8.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.81%	-0.73%	-2.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.34%	-0.73%	-2.61%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QFRD	LRNZ	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.74%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.74%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.74%	—	—

QFRD vs. LRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QFRD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than LRNZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

QFRD vs. LRNZ - Dividend Comparison

QFRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, while LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	0.00%
QFRD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, QFRD or LRNZ?

On fees, QFRD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QFRD or LRNZ?

QFRD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for LRNZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QFRD or LRNZ?

QFRD has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.

What is the main difference between QFRD and LRNZ?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and TrueMark Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFRD and 0.68% for LRNZ.