QFRD vs. FMTM
QFRD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF) and FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QFRD is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders Index, while FMTM is a Momentum fund. QFRD is passively managed, while FMTM is actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QFRD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FMTM.
Performance
QFRD vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFRD
- 1D
- -3.92%
- 1M
- 6.13%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMTM
- 1D
- -4.66%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- 25.27%
- 6M
- 26.43%
- 1Y
- 56.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QFRD vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFRD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF | 11.08% |
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 16.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFRD and FMTM is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFRD vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank
QFRD
FMTM
QFRD vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QFRD | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.50 | 2.06 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
QFRD vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFRD drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, smaller than the maximum FMTM drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFRD and FMTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFRD | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.69% | -12.12% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.58% | -4.91% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.86% | -1.89% | -0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.11% | — |
Volatility
QFRD vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFRD | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.55% | 23.34% | -2.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.55% | 23.29% | -2.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.55% | 23.29% | -2.74% |
QFRD vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFRD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFRD vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison
QFRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than FMTM's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 0.24% | 0.30% |
QFRD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF | 0.11% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFRD and FMTM have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QFRD.
FMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.11% for QFRD.
QFRD is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFRD and 0.45% for FMTM.
Find the right allocation for QFRD and FMTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer