QFRD vs. QDPL
QFRD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF) and QDPL (Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QFRD is a Quality Factor fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders Index, while QDPL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Index - Series 400. Both are passively managed. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QFRD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QDPL.
Performance
QFRD vs. QDPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFRD
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QDPL
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 8.07%
- YTD
- 9.38%
- 1Y
- 20.15%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 11.81%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.21M | $5.24M | $6.26M | |
| $22.97K | $34.82K | $12.88K |
QFRD vs. QDPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFRD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF | 13.35% |
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 7.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFRD and QDPL is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFRD vs. QDPL — Risk / Return Rank
QFRD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QDPL
QFRD vs. QDPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QFRD | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.10 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.06 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QFRD vs. QDPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFRD drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, smaller than the maximum QDPL drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFRD and QDPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFRD | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.69% | -22.59% | +12.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.65% | -1.57% | -2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.45% | -5.04% | +1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.00% | — |
Volatility
QFRD vs. QDPL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFRD | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.02% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.92% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.17% | 12.68% | +6.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 15.02% | +4.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 14.99% | +4.18% |
QFRD vs. QDPL - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFRD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than QDPL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFRD vs. QDPL - Dividend Comparison
QFRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than QDPL's 4.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 4.58% | 4.84% | 5.43% | 6.30% | 7.27% | 2.44% |
QFRD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFRD and QDPL have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QFRD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QFRD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QDPL.
QDPL has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 0.11% for QFRD.
QFRD is categorized as Quality Factor, while QDPL is Large Cap Blend Equities. QFRD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders Index, while QDPL tracks Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Index - Series 400. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFRD and 0.60% for QDPL.
Find the right allocation for QFRD and QDPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer