QFHD vs. XOMO
QFHD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF) and XOMO (YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QFHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while XOMO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. QFHD is passively managed, while XOMO is actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QFHD charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for XOMO.
Performance
QFHD vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFHD
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XOMO
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 16.03%
- 6M
- 18.72%
- 1Y
- 31.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QFHD vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 7.01% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 12.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFHD and XOMO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFHD vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank
QFHD
XOMO
QFHD vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QFHD | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.82 | 0.37 | +1.46 |
Drawdowns
QFHD vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum XOMO drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and XOMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFHD | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -18.90% | +13.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -10.83% | +9.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.13% | -7.22% | +5.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.96% | — |
Volatility
QFHD vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFHD | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 20.05% | -9.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 18.93% | -8.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 18.93% | -8.56% |
QFHD vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFHD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFHD vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison
QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than XOMO's 35.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 35.93% | 31.64% | 26.94% | 5.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFHD and XOMO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QFHD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QFHD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.
XOMO has the higher dividend yield at 35.93%, compared with 1.34% for QFHD.
QFHD is categorized as Dividend, while XOMO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFHD and 1.01% for XOMO.
Find the right allocation for QFHD and XOMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer