QFHD vs. GCOW

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

QFHD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QFHD is a Quality Factor fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while GCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QFHD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCOW.

Performance

QFHD vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QFHD

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 1.83%
• 6M: 8.33%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

GCOW

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 5.47%
• 6M: 7.25%
• YTD: 14.77%
• 1Y: 27.77%
• 3Y*: 16.05%
• 5Y*: 13.35%
• 10Y*: 9.89%
• ALL TIME*: 10.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	$12.71M	$12.72M	$12.45M
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF	$8.06K	$29.95K	$25.81K

QFHD vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF	11.66%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	12.46%

Correlation

The correlation between QFHD and GCOW is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026	0.60

Return for Risk

QFHD vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QFHD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GCOW

GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 90
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 93
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QFHD vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QFHD	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.60	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.73	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.46	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.61	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.15	—

Drawdowns

QFHD vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and GCOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	QFHD	GCOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.52%	-37.64%	+32.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.83%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.91%	-0.73%	-1.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.77%	-5.82%	+4.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.53%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QFHD	GCOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.59%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.54%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.91%	10.99%	-0.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.91%	13.55%	-2.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.91%	16.00%	-5.09%

QFHD vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QFHD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

QFHD vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than GCOW's 4.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	4.58%	4.06%	5.14%	5.28%	4.39%	4.23%	4.12%	4.40%	3.94%	2.79%	1.95%
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF	1.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QFHD and GCOW in my portfolio?

QFHD and GCOW have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QFHD or GCOW?

On fees, QFHD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QFHD or GCOW?

QFHD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QFHD or GCOW?

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 1.29% for QFHD.

What is the main difference between QFHD and GCOW?

QFHD is categorized as Quality Factor, while GCOW is Large Cap Value Equities. QFHD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFHD and 0.60% for GCOW.