PSFF vs. QDPL
PSFF (Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF) and QDPL (Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSFF is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer, while QDPL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Index - Series 400. PSFF is actively managed, while QDPL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSFF returned 9.45%/yr vs 12.06%/yr for QDPL. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PSFF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QDPL.
Performance
PSFF vs. QDPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSFF achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly lower than QDPL's 10.98% return.
PSFF
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 6.41%
- YTD
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 13.22%
- 3Y*
- 12.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.45%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.04%
QDPL
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- YTD
- 10.98%
- 1Y
- 21.91%
- 3Y*
- 19.28%
- 5Y*
- 12.06%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.37M | $1.73M | $1.90M | |
| $5.42M | $5.30M | $6.18M |
PSFF vs. QDPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSFF Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF | 7.27% | 10.38% | 13.18% | 18.39% | -4.11% | 3.13% |
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 10.98% | 16.52% | 22.83% | 23.66% | -16.25% | 7.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSFF and QDPL is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021 | 0.84 |
The correlation between PSFF and QDPL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSFF vs. QDPL — Risk / Return Rank
PSFF
QDPL
PSFF vs. QDPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSFF | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.31 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 2.55 | +1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.76 | 10.97 | +6.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSFF vs. QDPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSFF drawdown since its inception was -10.78%, smaller than the maximum QDPL drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFF and QDPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSFF | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.78% | -22.59% | +11.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.67% | -8.65% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.78% | -17.75% | +6.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.78% | -22.59% | +11.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.13% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -5.04% | +3.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.75% | 2.00% | -1.25% |
Volatility
PSFF vs. QDPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) is 1.72%, while Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) has a volatility of 3.35%. This indicates that PSFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSFF | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.72% | 3.35% | -1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.86% | 10.01% | -5.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.00% | 12.65% | -6.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.25% | 15.04% | -5.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.03% | 15.00% | -5.97% |
PSFF vs. QDPL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSFF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QDPL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSFF vs. QDPL - Dividend Comparison
PSFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSFF Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 4.51% | 4.84% | 5.43% | 6.30% | 7.27% | 2.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSFF and QDPL have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDPL has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to PSFF (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSFF dropped -10.78% vs QDPL's -22.59%.
On 5-year performance, QDPL leads with 12.06% vs 9.45% for PSFF. On fees, QDPL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PSFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QDPL has performed better with a 12.06% return vs 9.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QDPL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSFF.
QDPL has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 0.00% for PSFF.
PSFF is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QDPL is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSFF and 0.60% for QDPL.
PSFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSFF and QDPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer