PSFF vs. TMSRX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) and T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX).

PSFF is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on Dec 29, 2020. TMSRX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Feb 22, 2018.

Performance

PSFF vs. TMSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) and T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PSFF vs. TMSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PSFF Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF	-0.88%	10.38%	13.18%	18.39%	-4.11%	11.81%	0.37%
TMSRX T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund	0.41%	2.95%	5.36%	5.09%	-4.69%	-2.08%	0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSFF achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly lower than TMSRX's 0.41% return.

PSFF

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: -1.37%
• YTD: -0.88%
• 6M: 1.42%
• 1Y: 12.24%
• 3Y*: 11.73%
• 5Y*: 8.52%
• 10Y*: —

TMSRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.41%
• 6M: 1.50%
• 1Y: 2.93%
• 3Y*: 4.31%
• 5Y*: 1.16%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSFF vs. TMSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSFF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TMSRX's 1.19% expense ratio.

TMSRX

T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund

PSFF

Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF

Return for Risk

PSFF vs. TMSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSFF

PSFF Risk / Return Rank: 76
PSFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
PSFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
PSFF Omega Ratio Rank: 76
PSFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
PSFF Martin Ratio Rank: 87

TMSRX

TMSRX Risk / Return Rank: 73
TMSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
TMSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
TMSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
TMSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
TMSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSFF vs. TMSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) and T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSFF	TMSRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	1.41	-0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	1.85	-0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.36	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	1.50	+0.45
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.50	5.92	+4.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSFF vs. TMSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSFF Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the TMSRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSFF and TMSRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSFF	TMSRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27	1.41	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93	0.42	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.99	0.84	+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between PSFF and TMSRX is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PSFF vs. TMSRX - Dividend Comparison

PSFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TMSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.49%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PSFF Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TMSRX T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund	9.49%	7.59%	6.72%	5.95%	2.29%	2.88%	3.35%	3.00%	3.56%

Drawdowns

PSFF vs. TMSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSFF drawdown since its inception was -10.78%, roughly equal to the maximum TMSRX drawdown of -10.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFF and TMSRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSFF	TMSRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.78%	-10.67%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.58%	-1.84%	-4.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.78%	-10.59%	-0.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.00%	-0.16%	-1.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.65%	-2.79%	+1.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.23%	0.50%	+0.73%

Volatility

PSFF vs. TMSRX - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX) at 0.00%. This indicates that PSFF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSFF	TMSRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.86%	0.00%	+2.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.31%	1.44%	+2.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.70%	2.10%	+7.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.22%	2.79%	+6.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.19%	3.31%	+5.88%