PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PSFF vs. PTLC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


PSFFPTLC
YTD Return13.14%26.39%
1Y Return17.31%34.24%
3Y Return (Ann)9.00%11.21%
Sharpe Ratio3.213.04
Sortino Ratio4.584.04
Omega Ratio1.671.57
Calmar Ratio5.044.37
Martin Ratio25.7619.72
Ulcer Index0.73%1.87%
Daily Std Dev5.84%12.12%
Max Drawdown-10.62%-26.63%
Current Drawdown-0.03%-0.20%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between PSFF and PTLC is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

PSFF vs. PTLC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PSFF achieves a 13.14% return, which is significantly lower than PTLC's 26.39% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.25%
13.18%
PSFF
PTLC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PSFF vs. PTLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSFF has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than PTLC's 0.60% expense ratio.


PSFF
Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF
Expense ratio chart for PSFF: current value at 0.93% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.93%
Expense ratio chart for PTLC: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PSFF vs. PTLC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSFF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PSFF, currently valued at 3.21, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.21
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PSFF, currently valued at 4.58, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.58
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PSFF, currently valued at 1.67, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.67
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PSFF, currently valued at 5.04, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.005.04
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PSFF, currently valued at 25.75, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0025.76
PTLC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PTLC, currently valued at 3.04, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.04
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PTLC, currently valued at 4.04, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.04
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PTLC, currently valued at 1.57, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.57
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PTLC, currently valued at 4.37, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.37
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PTLC, currently valued at 19.72, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0019.72

PSFF vs. PTLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSFF Sharpe Ratio is 3.21, which is comparable to the PTLC Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSFF and PTLC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.21
3.04
PSFF
PTLC

Dividends

PSFF vs. PTLC - Dividend Comparison

PSFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.


TTM202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSFF
Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
0.93%1.18%1.26%0.73%1.08%1.10%1.00%0.97%1.08%0.43%

Drawdowns

PSFF vs. PTLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSFF drawdown since its inception was -10.62%, smaller than the maximum PTLC drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFF and PTLC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.03%
-0.20%
PSFF
PTLC

Volatility

PSFF vs. PTLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) is 1.85%, while Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that PSFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.85%
3.81%
PSFF
PTLC