PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSFF vs. CALF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PSFF vs. CALF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PSFF vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PSFF
Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF
-0.88%10.38%13.18%18.39%-4.11%11.81%0.37%
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.28%2.33%-7.41%35.43%-15.20%40.68%-0.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSFF achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly lower than CALF's 1.28% return.


PSFF

1D
1.57%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
-0.88%
6M
1.42%
1Y
12.24%
3Y*
11.73%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*

CALF

1D
1.93%
1M
-2.56%
YTD
1.28%
6M
3.41%
1Y
21.42%
3Y*
6.95%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PSFF vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSFF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PSFF vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSFF
PSFF Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PSFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSFF Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
PSFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSFF Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

CALF
CALF Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSFF vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSFFCALFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

0.95

+0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.84

1.46

+0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.21

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

1.32

+0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.50

6.03

+4.47

PSFF vs. CALF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSFF Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the CALF Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSFF and CALF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSFFCALFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

0.95

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.13

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.32

+0.67

Correlation

The correlation between PSFF and CALF is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PSFF vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison

PSFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSFF
Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.43%1.43%1.07%1.18%0.85%2.63%0.82%0.99%1.39%0.70%

Drawdowns

PSFF vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSFF drawdown since its inception was -10.78%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFF and CALF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PSFFCALFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.78%

-47.58%

+36.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.58%

-16.47%

+9.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.78%

-34.22%

+23.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-6.40%

+4.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-10.92%

+9.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

3.60%

-2.37%

Volatility

PSFF vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) is 2.86%, while Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that PSFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CALF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PSFFCALFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

4.25%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.31%

11.14%

-6.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.70%

22.66%

-12.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.22%

23.68%

-14.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.19%

26.18%

-16.99%