PSFF vs. AOM

In the year-to-date period, PSFF achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than AOM's 3.67% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

PSFF has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than AOM's 0.25% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PSFF Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the AOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSFF and AOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PSFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%.

The maximum PSFF drawdown since its inception was -10.78%, smaller than the maximum AOM drawdown of -19.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFF and AOM.

Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) has a higher volatility of 2.76% compared to iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) at 1.85%. This indicates that PSFF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.