PSCC vs. FCOM
PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) and FCOM (Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while FCOM is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSCC returned 6.99%/yr vs 11.60%/yr for FCOM. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSCC charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FCOM.
Performance
PSCC vs. FCOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCC achieves a 12.79% return, which is significantly higher than FCOM's -3.17% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCC has underperformed FCOM with an annualized return of 6.99%, while FCOM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.60% annualized return.
PSCC
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 7.91%
- YTD
- 12.79%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 0.56%
- 5Y*
- 1.00%
- 10Y*
- 6.99%
FCOM
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -4.97%
- YTD
- -3.17%
- 6M
- -1.90%
- 1Y
- 14.88%
- 3Y*
- 22.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.60%
PSCC vs. FCOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 12.79% | -16.47% | 0.98% | 14.83% | -6.66% | 28.82% | 11.17% | 17.39% | -6.72% | 9.72% |
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | -3.17% | 26.06% | 33.05% | 44.65% | -38.97% | 13.88% | 28.33% | 26.69% | -5.33% | 8.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCC and FCOM is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PSCC and FCOM has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PSCC vs. FCOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCC
FCOM
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCC
FCOM
-
Basic Materials
PSCC
FCOM
-
Industrials
PSCC
FCOM
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSCC
FCOM
Communication Services
PSCC
-
FCOM
Energy
PSCC
-
FCOM
-
Financial Services
PSCC
-
FCOM
-
Healthcare
PSCC
-
FCOM
-
Real Estate
PSCC
-
FCOM
Technology
PSCC
-
FCOM
Utilities
PSCC
-
FCOM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCC vs. FCOM — Risk / Return Rank
PSCC
FCOM
PSCC vs. FCOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCC | FCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.18 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 1.11 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.49 | 4.05 | -3.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCC vs. FCOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCC drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum FCOM drawdown of -46.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCC and FCOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCC | FCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.61% | -46.76% | +13.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -13.48% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -21.16% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.36% | -46.76% | +23.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.61% | -46.76% | +13.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.94% | -6.40% | -5.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -8.66% | +2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.68% | 3.68% | +5.00% |
Volatility
PSCC vs. FCOM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) at 4.08%. This indicates that PSCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCC | FCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 4.08% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 11.19% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.61% | 15.43% | +1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 21.19% | -2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 20.96% | -1.66% |
PSCC vs. FCOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FCOM's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCC vs. FCOM - Dividend Comparison
PSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than FCOM's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | 0.96% | 0.88% | 0.87% | 0.77% | 1.04% | 0.90% | 0.68% | 0.86% | 2.78% | 11.70% | 2.27% | 2.92% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 1.97% | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCC and FCOM have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCC has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to FCOM (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCC dropped -33.61% vs FCOM's -46.76%.
On 10-year performance, FCOM leads with 11.60% vs 6.99% for PSCC. On fees, FCOM is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FCOM has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FCOM has performed better with a 11.60% return vs 6.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FCOM is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCC.
PSCC has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.96% for FCOM.
PSCC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while FCOM is Large Cap Growth Equities. PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while FCOM tracks MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCC and 0.08% for FCOM.
FCOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCC and FCOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer