PSCC vs. PSCM
PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) and PSCM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while PSCM is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 / Materials -SEC. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSCC returned 6.69%/yr vs 13.16%/yr for PSCM. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.29% expense ratio.
Performance
PSCC vs. PSCM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCC achieves a 10.85% return, which is significantly lower than PSCM's 27.23% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCC has underperformed PSCM with an annualized return of 6.69%, while PSCM has yielded a comparatively higher 13.16% annualized return.
PSCC
- 1D
- -2.16%
- 1M
- 4.01%
- YTD
- 10.85%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- 1Y
- 4.95%
- 3Y*
- 0.24%
- 5Y*
- 1.15%
- 10Y*
- 6.69%
PSCM
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 27.23%
- 6M
- 25.80%
- 1Y
- 60.72%
- 3Y*
- 19.11%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- 13.16%
PSCC vs. PSCM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 10.85% | -16.47% | 0.98% | 14.83% | -6.66% | 28.82% | 11.17% | 17.39% | -6.72% | 9.72% |
PSCM Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF | 27.23% | 15.59% | 0.67% | 19.86% | -6.45% | 18.02% | 22.18% | 21.75% | -23.28% | 10.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCC and PSCM is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010 | 0.56 |
The correlation between PSCC and PSCM shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSCC vs. PSCM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCC
PSCM
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCC
PSCM
-
Basic Materials
PSCC
PSCM
Consumer Cyclical
PSCC
PSCM
Industrials
PSCC
PSCM
-
Financial Services
PSCC
PSCM
Communication Services
PSCC
-
PSCM
-
Energy
PSCC
-
PSCM
Healthcare
PSCC
-
PSCM
-
Real Estate
PSCC
-
PSCM
-
Technology
PSCC
-
PSCM
-
Utilities
PSCC
-
PSCM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCC vs. PSCM — Risk / Return Rank
PSCC
PSCM
PSCC vs. PSCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCC | PSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.39 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.33 | 4.26 | -3.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.57 | 15.84 | -15.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCC vs. PSCM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCC drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum PSCM drawdown of -51.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCC and PSCM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCC | PSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.61% | -51.34% | +17.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -14.33% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -35.36% | +12.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.36% | -35.36% | +12.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.61% | -51.34% | +17.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.45% | -2.00% | -11.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -10.88% | +4.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.69% | 3.84% | +4.85% |
Volatility
PSCC vs. PSCM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) is 5.22%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that PSCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSCM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCC | PSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.22% | 7.65% | -2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 17.07% | -5.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.75% | 24.33% | -7.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 25.80% | -7.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.33% | 26.89% | -7.56% |
PSCC vs. PSCM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PSCC and PSCM have an expense ratio of 0.29%.
Dividends
PSCC vs. PSCM - Dividend Comparison
PSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than PSCM's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 2.35% | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% |
PSCM Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF | 1.26% | 1.17% | 0.80% | 0.81% | 0.93% | 0.67% | 1.56% | 1.14% | 1.25% | 0.61% | 0.76% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCC and PSCM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCM has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to PSCC (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCC dropped -33.61% vs PSCM's -51.34%.
On 10-year performance, PSCM leads with 13.16% vs 6.69% for PSCC. Both ETFs have the same 0.29% expense ratio. On volatility, PSCC has been the lower-risk option at 5.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSCM has performed better with a 13.16% return vs 6.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCC and PSCM have the same expense ratio: 0.29% per year.
PSCC has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 1.26% for PSCM.
PSCC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while PSCM is Materials. PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while PSCM tracks S&P Small Cap 600 / Materials -SEC.
PSCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCC and PSCM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer